Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

DENEV v. SWEDENDISSENTING OPINION OF MR P. LORENZEN

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: January 14, 1998

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

DENEV v. SWEDENDISSENTING OPINION OF MR P. LORENZEN

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: January 14, 1998

Cited paragraphs only

DISSENTING OPINION OF MR P. LORENZEN

I regret not being able to share the conclusion of the majority that there has been a violation of Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention in the present case.

In my opinion, a decision of a national court regarding the formal requirements for lodging an appeal in a civil case does not involve the determination of "civil rights and obligations" within the meaning of Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention. In this respect I refer to the arguments in my dissenting opinion in the case J.J. v. the Netherlands, No. 21351/93, Dec. 15.10.96, which is pending before the European Court of Human Rights.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846