Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF ÇAVUŞ AND OTHERS AGAINST TÜRKİYE AND 7 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 21385/10;20937/10;20950/10;22592/10;21453/10;21371/10;21348/10;21674/10 • ECHR ID: 001-223012

Document date: January 11, 2023

  • Inbound citations: 2
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF ÇAVUŞ AND OTHERS AGAINST TÜRKİYE AND 7 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 21385/10;20937/10;20950/10;22592/10;21453/10;21371/10;21348/10;21674/10 • ECHR ID: 001-223012

Document date: January 11, 2023

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ResDH(2023)6

Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

Eight cases against Türkiye

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 January 2023 at the 1453 rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

Application Nos.

Cases

Judgment of

Final on

21385/10

ÇAVUŞ AND OTHERS

07/06/2022

07/06/2022

20937/10

GÜNEL

07/06/2022

07/06/2022

20950/10

ÖNAL AND OTHERS

07/06/2022

07/06/2022

22592/10

SÜLEYMAN YILDIZ AND OTHERS

07/06/2022

07/06/2022

21453/10

VAROL AND OTHERS

07/06/2022

07/06/2022

21371/10

YAVUZ ÖZDEN

14/09/2021

14/12/2021

21348/10

YILDIZ AND AYDIN

07/06/2022

07/06/2022

21674/10

YILMAZ AND OTHERS

07/06/2022

07/06/2022

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the authorities’ unjustified interference with the applicants’ right to property (violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1);

Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments and noting that no award of just satisfaction was made by the Court in these cases (see document DH-DD(2022)1090 );

Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these cases continues to be examined within the framework of the Sarıca and Dilaver group of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707