Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)394

Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

Six cases against Hungary

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 December 2022 at the 1452 nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

30385/07

SZERDAHELYI

17/01/2012

17/04/2012

7871/10

KÖRTVÉLYESSY

05/04/2016

05/07/2016

20497/13

TÓTH

26/05/2020

26/05/2020

27585/13

UNITED CIVIL AVIATION TRADE UNION AND CSORBA

22/08/2018

31573/14

PÓKA

06/10/2020

06/10/2020

58271/15

KÖRTVÉLYESSY (No. 2)

18/07/2017

13/11/2017

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the authorities’ unjustified interference with the applicants’ right to freedom of assembly (Article 11);

Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the information provided by the government as regards the individual measures in these cases (see DH-DD(2022)1291 ), noted that the just satisfaction, where awarded, was paid by the government of the respondent State and that no further individual measures are possible in these cases;

Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Patyi and Others v. Hungary group of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.