CASE OF FURMAN AGAINST RUSSIA AND 16 OTHER CASES
Doc ref: 5945/04, 2686/06, 26920/09, 22094/05, 24842/04, 31276/02, 23304/05, 724/06, 39483/05, 33548/04, 3046... • ECHR ID: 001-214820
Document date: December 2, 2021
- Inbound citations: 179
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 2
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)334
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
17 cases against the Russian Federation
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 2 December 2021
at the 1419 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
5945/04
FURMAN
05/04/2007
05/07/2007
2686/06
KALUGINA
21/06/2016
21/06/2016
26920/09
KARPESH
14/03/2017
Loading citations...14/03/2017
22094/05+
KIM AND RYNDINA
17/01/2017
17/01/2017
24842/04
KLETSOVA
12/04/2007
10/12/2007
31276/02
KOLYADA
30/11/2006
28/02/2007
23304/05
KONOVALOVA
08/03/2016
08/03/2016
724/06+
LEGLER AND MARYIN
30/11/2017
30/11/2017
39483/05
LISEYTSEVA AND MASLOV
09/10/2014
09/01/2015
33548/04
LYATSKAYA
18/09/2008
18/12/2008
3046/03
SHLEPKIN
01/02/2007
09/07/2007
8363/03
VERETENNIKOV
12/03/2009
12/06/2009
21769/03
VELSKAYA
05/10/2006
05/01/2007
39678/03
VORONKOV
30/07/2015
30/10/2015
1387/04
YERSHOVA
08/04/2010
04/10/2010
19065/08+
YUDIN AND OTHERS
19/07/2016
19/07/2016
42389/02
ZHUK
14/11/2008
06/07/2009
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the failure or serious delay in enforcing the domestic judicial decisions imposing obligations on the State unitary enterprises and municipal unitary enterprises (violations of Article 6, paragraph 1, and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect (violations of Article 13);
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;
Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved, given that the domestic judicial decisions were enforced, or the debts arising out of those decisions were converted into just satisfaction awards in respect of pecuniary damage and were paid as such;
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these cases continues to be examined within the framework of the Gizzatova group of cases (Application No. 5124/03) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and
DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.