Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF BADAN AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND 6 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 56405/12;17899/08;50905/08;22400/13;46256/10;53209/12;51662/12 • ECHR ID: 001-215319

Document date: December 8, 2021

  • Inbound citations: 5
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF BADAN AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND 6 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 56405/12;17899/08;50905/08;22400/13;46256/10;53209/12;51662/12 • ECHR ID: 001-215319

Document date: December 8, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)401

Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

Seven cases against the Republic of Moldova

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 December 2021

at the 1420 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

56405/12

BADAN

29/06/2021

29/06/2021

17899/08

BOTEZATU

14/04/2015

14/07/2015

50905/08

CHIRICA

22/07/2014

22/10/2014

22400/13

CIOLACU

04/09/2018

04/09/2018

46256/10

LIMA S.R.L.

19/01/2021

19/01/2021

53209/12

MIHAILOV

29/06/2021

29/06/2021

51662/12+

OSADCII AND OTHERS

07/07/2020

07/07/2020

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the State’s failure to enforce final domestic judgments rendered in favour of the applicants (Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention) and lack of an effective remedy in this respect (Article 13 of the Convention);

Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2021)1046 );

Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved given that the domestic judgments have been fully executed or the outstanding pecuniary damage was fully covered by the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;

Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the group of cases Olaru v. Republic of Moldova and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707