Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

ZORNIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Doc ref: 3681/06 • ECHR ID: 001-118471

Document date: March 14, 2013

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 5

ZORNIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Doc ref: 3681/06 • ECHR ID: 001-118471

Document date: March 14, 2013

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

Application no. 3681/06 Azra ZORNIĆ against Bosnia and Herzegovina lodged on 19 December 2005

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The applicant, Ms Azra Zornić , is a Bosnian-Herzegovinian citizen, who was born in 1957 and lives in Sarajevo .

A. The circumstances of the case

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The applicant actively participates in the political life of the country. For instance, in 2002 she stood as a candidate of the Social Democratic Party of Bosnia and Herzegovina for election to the parliament of one of the Entities (Bosnia and Herzegovina consists of two Entities, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska , and the Brčko District).

As she does not declare affiliation with any of the “constituent peoples” (namely, Bosniacs , Croats and Serbs), she is ineligible to stand for election to the second chamber of the State parliament (the House of Peoples) and to the collective Head of State (the Presidency).

B. Relevant international and domestic law and practice

The relevant law and practice were set out in Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, ECHR 2009. Notably, the Constitution makes a distinction between “constituent peoples” (persons who declare affiliation with Bosniacs , Croats and Serbs) and “others” (members of ethnic minorities and persons who do not declare affiliation with any particular group because of intermarriage, mixed parenthood, or other reasons). In the former Yugoslavia , a person ’ s ethnic affiliation was decided solely by that person, through a system of self-classification. Thus, no objective criteria, such as knowledge of a certain language or belonging to a specific religion were required. Moreover, there was no requirement of acceptance by other members of the ethnic group in question. Since the Constitution contains no provisions regarding the determination of one ’ s ethnicity it appears that it was assumed that the traditional self-classification would suffice. In accordance with the Constitution, only persons declaring affiliation with a “constituent people” are entitled to run for the House of Peoples and the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina .

COMPLAINT

The applicant takes issue with her ineligibility to stand for election to the House of Peoples and the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina . She relies on Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 taken alone and in conjunction with Article 14.

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES

Has the applicant suffered discrimination, contrary to Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 and/or Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 , arising from the very existence of the constitutional arrangements according to which only those belonging to one of the three “ constituent peoples ” are eligible to stand for election to the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the House of Peoples of Bosnia and Herzegovina ( Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, ECHR 2009 )?

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846