Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

LUTSENKO v. UKRAINE (NO. 2)

Doc ref: 29334/11 • ECHR ID: 001-139584

Document date: November 21, 2013

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

LUTSENKO v. UKRAINE (NO. 2)

Doc ref: 29334/11 • ECHR ID: 001-139584

Document date: November 21, 2013

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

Application no . 29334/11 Yuriy Vitaliyovych LUTSENKO against Ukraine (no. 2 ) lodged on 6 May 2011

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The original facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in

the Court ’ s initial Statement of Facts and Questions to the Parties.

This is the second application from the former Minister of the Interior who was found guilty of embezzlement and abuse of office and sentenced to four year imprisonment in February 2012 but was pardoned on 7 April 2013 and released from prison. The case concerns the conditions of the applicant ’ s detention, his health conditions and medical care provided to him in the SIZO and the conditions of his detention during the court hearings.

The application was communicated by the President on 14 February 2012.

The parties submitted their written observations on admissibility and merits of the case.

The Court decided on 21 November 2013 to invite the Government to submit observations on the following questions concerning the days when the applicant was brought to the court for hearings:

QUESTIONS

1. When was the applicant fetched from his cell in the SIZO?

2. When was he put in the car which drove him to the court building?

3. When did the car reach the court building?

4. When was the applicant fetched from the car and brought to a waiting room in the court?

5. When really did the court hearings start ?

6. When exactly were the court hearings closed?

7. When was the applicant brought to the car which drove him back to the SIZO and whe re did he stay in the meantime?

8. When did the car reach the SIZO?

9. When was the applicant brought back to his cell and where did he stay in the meantime?

10. During the days when the applicant attended the hearings held before the Pechersk Court, could he consume food stuff and water from his own resources taking into account that this seems to be prohibited by Articles 1.29 and 3.19.3 of Instruction on organisation of convoys of arrested persons and person held in detention of 20 January 2005 no. 60?

11. The Government are requested to submit the text of the Instruction concerned.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846