Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

DEMİR v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 34965/09;2074/11;44409/11 • ECHR ID: 001-157732

Document date: September 10, 2015

  • Inbound citations: 1
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

DEMİR v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 34965/09;2074/11;44409/11 • ECHR ID: 001-157732

Document date: September 10, 2015

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 10 September 2015

SECOND SECTION

Application no. 34965/09 İlginç DEMİR against Turkey and 2 other applications (see list appended)

The applicants , whose details are set out in the attached table, are Turkish nationals.

A. The circumstances of the cases

The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

On various dates, the applicants initiated proceedings before the domestic courts, seeking the amendment of their first names. Their requests were rejected, as the domestic courts held that pursuant to Article 36 § 1 (b) of Law no. 5490, first names could only be amended once during a lifetime. In the case of all three applications, their first names had previously been amended upon requests filed by their parents at the time when the applicants were minor.

On 30 March 2012 the Constitutional Court annulled Article 36 § 1 (b) of Law no. 5490 .

The details of the applications appear in the table attached.

B. Relevant domestic law

Article 36 § 1 (b) of Law no. 5490, before its annulment by the Constitutional Court, read:

“...A request for an amendment of a civil registry record, concerning the same issue, may only be filed once during a lifetime.”

COMPLAINT

The applicants complain under Article 8 of the Convention about their inability to have their first names amended.

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES

Has there been an interference with the applicants ’ right to respect for their private life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, on account of the refusal by the domestic courts to allow the applicant s to amend their first names ? If so, was that interference in accordance with the law , did it pursue a legitimate aim, and was it necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2?

APPENDIX

No.

Application

no.

Lodged on

Applicant name

date of birth

place of residence

Represented by

Case specific details

34965/09

16/06/2009

İlginç DEMİR

08/07/1980

Gebze / Kocaeli

-

In 1992, due to a clerical error in the records, and upon the request of the applicant ’ s father, the Samsun Civil Court of General Jurisdiction ordered that the applicant ’ s first name be changed from “ İlgiç ” to “ İlginç ”. In 2008 the applicant initiated proceedings before the Gebze Civil Court of General Jurisdiction to have his first name amended as “Kemal İlginç ”. His request was rejected based on Article 36 § 1 (b) of Law no. 5490 . The final decision was delivered on 31 March 2009.

2074/11

08/11/2010

Edim ŞAHİN

01/01/1990

Çanakkale

Naciye YILDIRIM

In 1990, the applicant ’ s father initiated proceedings to have the applicant ’ s first name changed from “ Edim Hakkı ” to “ Edim ”. On 22 July 2008 the applicant initiated proceedings before the Lapseki Civil Court of General Jurisdiction to have his first name amended as “ Edim Hakkı ”, stating that Hakkı had been his grandfather ’ s name and that following divorce proceedings of his parents, his father had changed his first name in bad faith. This request was rejected based on Article 36 § 1 (b) of Law no. 5490 and t he final decision was served on the applicant on 12 May 2010.

44409/11

06/04/2011

Şüheda SOY

02/04/1973

Ankara

-

In 1983, due to a clerical error in the records, and upon the request of the applicant ’ s parents , the Mersin Civil Court of General Jurisdi c tion ordered that the applicant ’ s first name be changed from “ Şa hide” to “ Şüheda ”. In 2010, the applicant initiated proceedings before the Ankara Civil Court of General Jurisdiction to have h er first name amended as “ Şüheda Eda ” or solely as “ Eda ” . H er request was rejected based on Article 36 § 1 (b) of Law no. 5490. The final decisio n was delivered on 28 February 2011.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846