LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
ZABALETA ELOSEGUI v. SPAIN and 15 other applications
Doc ref: 17988/17, 17996/17, 23690/17, 24259/17, 25477/17, 25731/17, 25733/17, 29068/17, 30460/17, 30545/17, ... • ECHR ID: 001-175344
Document date: June 16, 2017
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
ZABALETA ELOSEGUI v. SPAIN and 15 other applications
Doc ref: 17988/17, 17996/17, 23690/17, 24259/17, 25477/17, 25731/17, 25733/17, 29068/17, 30460/17, 30545/17, ... • ECHR ID: 001-175344
Document date: June 16, 2017
Cited paragraphs only
Communicated on 16 June 2017
THIRD SECTION
Application no. 17988/17 Jose Javier ZABALETA ELOSEGUI against Spain and 15 other applications (see list appended)
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The applications concern the domestic courts ’ refusal to reduce the applicants ’ sentences of imprisonment on the basis, inter alia, of a new case-law adopted by the Supreme Court contrary to its previous approach [1] on the interpretation of the Council Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA [2] and, in particular, on taking into account a previous criminal conviction handed down and served in another EU Member State (in the instant case, France). This refusal implies the postponement of the applicants ’ final release .
QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES
1. Did the domestic courts ’ refusal to reduce the applicants ’ sentences of imprisonment [3] amount to a breach of Article 7 of the Convention (see, by way of comparison, Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, §§ 91-93 and §§ 111-118)?
2. Is the applicants ’ imprisonment in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention and, if so, from which date? ( see , by way of comparison, Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], cited above, §§ 123-132)?
APPENDIX
No.
Application no.
Lodged on
Applicant
Date of birth
Place of residence
Represented by
17988/17
24/02/2017
Jose Javier ZABALETA ELOSEGUI
05/12/1950
Zuera
Haizea ZILUAGA LARREATEGI
17996/17
24/02/2017
Aitzol GOGORZA OTAEGUI
17/09/1975
Bizkaia
Onintza OSTOLAZA ARRUABARRENA
23690/17
17/03/2017
Juan Carlos SUBIJANA IZQUIERDO
21/02/1964
Vitoria- Gasteiz
Iker URBINA FERNANDEZ
24259/17
17/03/2017
Jose Ramon LOPEZ DE ABECHUCO LIQUINIANO
09/10/1949
Villabona
Iker URBINA FERNANDEZ
25477/17
28/03/2017
Jose Maria ARREGUI EROSTARBE
27/03/1946
Alicante
Onintza OSTOLAZA ARRUABARRENA
25731/17
27/03/2017
Idoia MENDIZABAL MUJICA
19/06/1977
Picassent
Haizea ZILUAGA LARREATEGI
25733/17
27/03/2017
Josu ARKAUZ ARANA
28/06/1957
Murcia
Onintza OSTOLAZA ARRUABARRENA
29068/17
06/04/2017
Juan Luis AGUIRRE LETE
30/05/1963
Zuera
Iñigo IRUIN SANZ
30460/17
06/04/2017
Inaki BILBAO BEASKOETXEA
04/06/1950
Castelló
Inaki GOIOAGA LLANO
30545/17
12/04/2017
Agurtzane DELGADO IRIONDO
01/11/1958
Granada
Iñigo IRUIN SANZ
33238/17
28/04/2017
Oscar CELARAIN ORTIZ
02/08/1974
Castellón de la Plana
Haizea ZILUAGA LARREATEGI
33640/17
28/04/2017
Xabier ZABALO BEITIA
19/07/1973
Cádiz
Haizea ZILUAGA LARREATEGI
33642/17
28/04/2017
Ainhoa BARBARIN YURREBASO
07/08/1971
Picassent
Onintza OSTOLAZA ARRUABARRENA
33643/17
28/04/2017
Balbino SAENZ OLARRA
08/05/1962
Picassent
Haizea ZILUAGA LARREATEGI
34084/17
28/04/2017
Andoni OTEGI ERASO
28/06/1975
Almeria
Haizea ZILUAGA LARREATEGI
35242/17
04/05/2017
Julen ATXURRA EGURROLA
03/02/1959
Puerto de Santa Maria
Inaki GOIOAGA LLANO
[1] See the Supreme Court ’s judgment of 13 March 2014 (STS no. 186/2014).
[2] Council Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA of 24 July 2008 on taking account of convictions in the Member States of the European Union in the course of new criminal proceedings .
[3] Concerning the first applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional ’s decision ( auto ) of 9 June 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 14 December 2015 (STS no. 804/2015); concerning the second applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional’s decision ( auto ) of 9 June 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 26 January 2016 (STS no. 16/2016); concerning the third applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional’s decision ( auto ) of 9 June 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 11 December 201 5 (STS no. 854/2015); concerning the fourth applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional ’s decision ( auto ) of 9 June 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 11 February 2016 (STS no. 85/2016 ); concerning the fifth applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional ’s decision ( auto ) of 9 June 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 7 December 2015 (STS no. 789/2015); concerning the sixth applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional ’s decision ( auto ) of 9 June 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 25 November 2015 (STS no. 829/2015); concerning the seventh applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional ’s decision ( auto ) of 10 July 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 3 February 2016 (STS no. 50/2016) ; c oncerning the eig ht h applicant, see, in particular , see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional’s decision ( auto ) of 5 June 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 10 February 2016 (STS no. 76 / 2016 ) ; concerning the ninth applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional’s decision ( auto ) of 2 December 201 4 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 24 May 201 5 (STS no. 336 / 2015 ) ; concerning the tenth applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional’s decision ( auto ) of 2 June 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 20 April 2016 (STS no. 333/2016); concerning the eleventh applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional’s decision ( auto ) of 15 April 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 18 November 2015 (STS no. 763/2015); concerning the twelfth applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional’s decision ( auto ) of 12 June 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 3 December 2015 (STS no. 772/2015); concerning the thirteenth applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional’s decision ( auto ) of 9 June 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 22 December 2015 (STS no. 818/2015 ); concerning the fourteenth applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional’s decision ( auto ) of 23 June 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 23 December 2015 (STS no. 868/2015); concerning th e fifteenth applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional’s decision ( auto ) of 15 April 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 18 November 201 5 (STS no. 763 / 2015 ) ; concerning th e sixteenth applicant, see, in particular, the Audiencia Nacional’s decision ( auto ) of 9 June 2015 and the Supreme Court’s judgment of 21 January 2016 (STS no. 8/2016) .
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
