LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
KRDŽALIJA AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO
Doc ref: 79065/13 • ECHR ID: 001-180761
Document date: January 19, 2018
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 2
KRDŽALIJA AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO
Doc ref: 79065/13 • ECHR ID: 001-180761
Document date: January 19, 2018
Cited paragraphs only
Communicated on 19 January 2018
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 79065/13 Sejda KRDŽALIJA and others against Montenegro lodged on 8 December 2013
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The application concerns the deportation of the applicants ’ family members by the Montenegrin authorities to the authorities of Republika Srpska in Bosnia and Herzegovina in May 1992, where they were later killed or went missing. The applicants complain, under procedural limb of Articles 2 and 3, about a lack of an effective investigation into the impugned event.
QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES
1. Have the applicants complied with the six-month time-limit laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention? The Government are invited to submit a proof of when the judgment of the Court of Appeals of 17 May 2013 was dispatched to the applicants, as well as copies of delivery slips, if available, as a proof of when the applicants received it.
2. Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life (see paragraph 104 of Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, ECHR 2000-VII), was the investigation in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 2 of the Convention? In particular, the Government are invited to inform the Court: (a) what investigative actions have been undertaken and when, (b) was the investigation conducted by independent authorities, and (c) who represented the State in the civil proceedings the applicants had instituted against the State?
3. Having regard to the procedural protection from torture and/or inhuman and degrading treatment (see paragraph 131 of Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, ECHR 2000-IV), was the investigation in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 3 of the Convention?
A PPENDIX
N o .
First name LASTNAME
Birth year
Nationality
Place of residence
Representative
Sejda KRDŽALIJA
1949Bosnia and Herzegovina
Goražde
T. Gorjanc-Prelević
Ramiza BI Č O
1933Bosnia and Herzegovina
Goražde
T. Gorjanc-Prelević
Sabina DOLOVAC
1985Bosnia and Herzegovina
Goražde
T. Gorjanc-Prelević
Admira DRUSTINAC
1977Bosnia and Herzegovina
Wuppertal
T. Gorjanc-Prelević
Fikreta HAD Ž I Ć
1955Bosnia and Herzegovina
Goražde
T. Gorjanc-Prelević
Hizreta HASANBEGOVI Ć
1955Bosnia and Herzegovina
Goražde
T. Gorjanc-Prelević
Mirzeta HO Å O
1951Bosnia and Herzegovina
Goražde
T. Gorjanc-Prelević
Hikmeta PRELO
1953Bosnia and Herzegovina
Goražde
T. Gorjanc-Prelević
Elmedina SELIMOVI Ć
1981Bosnia and Herzegovina
Goražde
T. Gorjanc-Prelević
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
