LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
TRADE UNION OF THE CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR POWER PLANT v. UKRAINE and 3 other applications
Doc ref: 76033/14;14502/18;41881/18;43925/18 • ECHR ID: 001-192886
Document date: April 3, 2019
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
TRADE UNION OF THE CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR POWER PLANT v. UKRAINE and 3 other applications
Doc ref: 76033/14;14502/18;41881/18;43925/18 • ECHR ID: 001-192886
Document date: April 3, 2019
Cited paragraphs only
Communicated on 3 April 2019
FIFTH SECTION
Application no. 76033/14 TRADE UNION OF THE CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR POWER PLANT against Ukraine and 3 other applications (see list appended)
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
In various disputes domestic courts delivered decisions favourable to the applicants. The opposing parties appealed and the judgments were quashed or amended on appeal in ways unfavourable to the applicants.
The subject-matter of the proceedings and references to final decisions of the domestic courts are set out in the Appendix.
The applicants complain mainly under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that they were not duly informed of the proceedings on appeal and/or of the opposing parties ’ submissions in them and were, therefore, not given an opportunity adequately to participate in them, in breach of the principle of equality of arms.
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES
Was the principle of equality of arms, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, respected during the proceedings in the applicants ’ cases?
No.
Application no.
Lodged on
Applicant
Date of birth
Place of residence or of registered office
Nationality for individuals or country of registration for legal entities
Represented by
Subject matter of the domestic proceeding
Final domestic decision
1
76033/14
25/11/2014
TRADE UNION OF THE CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
31/03/2000
Slavutych
Registered in Ukraine
Andriy Mykhaylovych PANCHENKO
Pension Fund ’ s claim for reimbursement of certain costs arising from payment of pensions to the applicant organisation ’ s employees
High Administrative Court, 19/06/2014
2
14502/18
12/03/2018
Igor Mykolayovych TSUGEL
30/04/1965
Khmelnytskyy
Ukrainian
Recalculation of early judicial retirement benefits
Vinnytsya Administrative Court of Appeal, 16/11/2017
3
41881/18
23/08/2018
Artur Sergiyovych VOYTSEKHOVSKYY
20/04/1971
Cherepovets
Russian
Invalidation of a will
Supreme Court, 06/03/2018
4
43925/18
06/09/2018
Anatoliy Mykolayovych GORYACHYY
15/06/1967
Fastiv
Ukrainian
Challenge against the applicant ’ s discharge from the armed forces
Supreme Court, 13/06/2018
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
