Communicated on 6 September 2019

SECOND SECTION

Application no. 57663/18 Anne Grethe RIHM against Norway lodged on 29 November 2018

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The application concerns the domestic courts ’ decision to authorise the forced sale of the applicant ’ s house to cover costs and interest totalling NOK 7,624 (approximately EUR 817), which were incurred during the collection of municipal fees from the applicant. Because the claim was later withdrawn, the order to sell the applicant ’ s house was not enforced.

Under Article 8 of the Convention, the applicant complains of a violation of her right to respect for her home. Under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, she complains of a violation of her right to the peaceful enjoyment of her possessions.

QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES

1. Has the applicant exhausted all effective domestic remedies, as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention?

2. Having regard to Article 35 § 3 (b) of the Convention, d id the applicant suffer a significant disadvantage?

3. Has there been an interference with the applicant ’ s right to respect for her home, within the meaning of Article 8? If so, was the interference in accordance with the law, did it pursue a legitimate aim and was it necessary in a democratic society (see Rousk v. Sweden , no. 27183/04, 25 July 2013)?

4. Has there been an interference with the applicant ’ s peaceful enjoyment of her possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? If so, was there a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aims sought to be realized (see Rousk v. Sweden , cited above )?