Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

VALIKOV AND DRAT v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 166/15 • ECHR ID: 001-211985

Document date: August 31, 2021

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 4

VALIKOV AND DRAT v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 166/15 • ECHR ID: 001-211985

Document date: August 31, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

Published on 20 September 2021

THIRD SECTION

Application no. 166/15 Aleksey Igorevich VALIKOV and Leonid Sergeyevich DRAT against Russia lodged on 10 December 2014 communicated on 31 August 2021

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The application concerns alleged violation of the applicants’ right to a fair trial on account of the use for their criminal conviction of a surrender and confession statement made by the second applicant in detention and in the absence of a lawyer ( Beuze v. Belgium [GC], no. 71409/10, §§ 119-50, 9 November 2018, and Turbylev v. Russia , no. 4722/09, §§ 92-98, 6 October 2015).

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES

Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against them, in accordance with Article 6 of the Convention? In particular, having regard to the fact that the second applicant was not assisted by a lawyer when he made the impugned statements to the deputy head of the correctional colony where he was serving his sentence and to the principles adopted by the Grand Chamber in the cases of Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 50541/08 and 3 others, §§ 255 ‑ 74, 13 September 2016), and Beuze , cited above, §§ 119 ‑ 50), has there been a breach of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention?

APPENDIX

Application No.

Case Title

Introduction Date

Applicants’ conviction

Appeal

Surrender and confession statement (circumstances)

Second applicant’s situation when making a surrender and confession statement

Motion for inadmissibility denied (reasons)

166/15

Valikov and Drat v. Russia

10/12/2014

Syktyvkar Town Court

Komi Republic

23/12/2013

of intentional damage of property by fire (penitentiary colony premises),

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

11/06/2014

Record of the statement of surrender and confession given by Mr Drat on 14/02/2011 (incriminating Mr Drat and Mr Valikov) at IK-25

Komi Republic ( ФКУ ИК-25 ГУФСИН РФ по РК ) contains a reference to Article 51 of the Constitution that no one is obliged to incriminate oneself, and the second applicant’s signature

detained at IK-25 of the Komi Republic ( ФКУ ИК-25 ГУФСИН РФ по РК )

in accordance with his conviction on 11/06/2010 by the Syktyvdinskiy District Court of the Komi Republic

Mr Drat gave a statement of surrender and confession voluntarily after he had been informed of his right not to incriminate himself,

receiving and drawing up of the statement of surrender and confession was done in accordance with applicable legislation,

the fact that the statement of surrender and confession was given to the deputy head of the correctional colony, and that the latter drew it up in the absence of a lawyer and while Mr Drat had been in the disciplinary ward, did not contravene the law.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846