EDGARDO BONAZZI AGAINST ITALY

Doc ref: 7975/77 • ECHR ID: 001-49242

Document date: October 23, 1981

Doc ref: 7975/77 • ECHR ID: 001-49242

Document date: October 23, 1981

Cited paragraphs only

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of

the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),

Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of

Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention

relating to the application lodged by Mr Edgardo Bonazzi against Italy

(No. 7975/77);

Whereas on 27 April 1981 the Commission transmitted the said report to

the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months

provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention

has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European

Court of Human Rights, in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the

convention;

Whereas in his application introduced on 8 July 1977, the applicant

complained that his detention following a warrant of arrest issued by

the Assize Court of Appeal of Ancona on 15 June 1976 was not lawful

under Italian law and that this constituted a violation of Article 5,

paragraph 1 (art. 5-1), of the convention and that no court decided on

his appeal against the above-mentioned warrant of arrest contrary to

Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), of the convention;

Whereas the Commission, having declared the application admissible on

13 December 1978 had expressed in its report unanimously the opinion

that there was no breach of Article 5, paragraph 1 (art. 5-1), of the

convention and equally unanimously that there was no breach of

Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), of the convention;

Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in

accordance with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the convention;

Voting in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1

(art. 32-1), of the convention,

Decides that in this case there was no violation of the Convention for

the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant