Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SANCHEZ-REISSE CASE

Doc ref: 9862/82 • ECHR ID: 001-55443

Document date: September 25, 1987

  • Inbound citations: 2
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

SANCHEZ-REISSE CASE

Doc ref: 9862/82 • ECHR ID: 001-55443

Document date: September 25, 1987

Cited paragraphs only



The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of

the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),

Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in

the Sanchez-Reisse case, delivered on 21 October 1986 and transmitted

the same day to the Committee of Ministers;

Recalling that the case had its origin in an application against

Switzerland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights under

Article 25 (art. 25) of the convention by Mr Leandro Sanchez-Reisse, an

Argentinian national, alleging that the procedure adopted by the Swiss

Federal Court for considering his requests for release was in breach

of Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), of the convention;

Recalling that the case had been brought before the Court by the

European Commission of Human Rights and by the Government of

Switzerland;

Whereas in its judgment of 21 October 1986 the Court:

- held by five votes to two that there had been a violation of

Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), of the convention on account of the

non-compliance with procedural guarantees;

- held by six votes to one that there had been a violation of

Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), on account of the failure to take

decisions "speedily";

- held by six votes to one that the respondent state was to pay to

the applicant six thousand eight hundred and sixty-eight Swiss francs

(6 868 SF) for costs and expenses;

Having regard to the "Rules concerning the application of Article 54

(art. 54) of the convention";

Having invited the Government of Switzerland to inform it of the

measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment, having

regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the convention

to abide by the judgment;

Whereas, during the examination of this case by the Committee of

Ministers, the Government of Switzerland informed the Committee of the

measures taken in consequence of the judgment, this information being

summarised in the appendix to this resolution;

Having satisfied itself that the Government of Switzerland has paid

the applicant the sum provided for in the Court's judgment

of 21 October 1986,

Declares, after taking note of the information supplied by the

Government of Switzerland, that it has exercised its function under

Article 54 (art. 54) of the convention in this case.

Appendix to Resolution DH (87) 12

Information supplied by the Government of Switzerland

during the examination of the Sanchez-Reisse case

by the Committee of Ministers

Following the Court's judgment of 21 October 1986, the Swiss

Government paid the applicant the sum of 6 868 Swiss francs awarded by

the Court for his costs and expenses.

A few days after judgment was delivered, the Federal Ministry of

Justice called a meeting of all the competent departments of the

Federal Administration and a representative of the Swiss Federal Court

for an exchange of views on the consequences, for Switzerland,

inherent in the execution of the judgment of 21 October 1986.

With a view to bringing the judgment to the knowledge of the Swiss

legal circles concerned it was decided, in accordance with the

practice followed in similar cases, to publish the principal reasons

for the Sanchez-Reisse judgment in the journal "Jurisprudence des

autorités administratives de la Confédération" (they were published in

issue 50/IV, 1986, No. 91).

As far as more general measures were concerned, it was decided first

of all to take steps to ensure that the provisions of the Federal Act

on International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of

20 March 1981 (EIMP), which replaced, with effect from 1 January 1983,

the provisions complained of (in the Act of 1892 now repealed), are

strictly applied by the Federal Police Department and the Swiss

Federal Court, with a view to obviating any difficulties which might

arise from the requirements of Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), of

the convention.

Convinced that, in accordance with the new legislation, a person in

detention pending extradition has in practice the minimum of

adversarial proceedings required by Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4),

of the convention (see paragraphs 50 and 51 of the judgment), the

competent Swiss authorities have concluded that at this stage a

partial revision of EIMP is not necessary.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 396058 • Paragraphs parsed: 43415240 • Citations processed 3359795