Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

BRICMONT CASE

Doc ref: 10857/84 • ECHR ID: 001-55495

Document date: November 16, 1990

  • Inbound citations: 32
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

BRICMONT CASE

Doc ref: 10857/84 • ECHR ID: 001-55495

Document date: November 16, 1990

Cited paragraphs only



The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

(hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),

Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the

Bricmont case delivered on 7 July 1989 and transmitted the same day to the

Committee of Ministers;

Recalling that the case originated in an application against Belgium lodged with

the European Commission of Human Rights on 13 February 1984 under Article 25

(art. 25) of the Convention by Mr. Georges Bricmont and

Mrs. Louise Bricmont-Barré, Canadian nationals, who complained of the conduct of

criminal proceedings instituted against them and in particular of the failure to

arrange a confrontation between a member of the royal family, as party seeking

damages, and the applicants in respect of certain charges;

Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Commission

on 18 December 1987;

Whereas in its judgment of 7 July 1989 the Court:

- declared unanimously that the Government were estopped

  from relying on the rule that domestic remedies must be exhausted;

- held by five votes to two that there had been a breach of Article 6 (art. 6)

  as regards the failure to arrange a confrontation between the party seeking

  civil damages and Mr Bricmont on three of the five charges on which he was

  convicted;

- held unanimously that there had been no breach of

  Article 6 (art. 6) as regards the failure to arrange a confrontation between

  the party seeking damages and Mrs Bricmont;

- held by five votes to two that there had been no breach

  of Article 6 (art. 6) as regards the failure to have the accounts audited;

- held unanimously that there had been no violation of

  Article 6 (art. 6) in respect of any of the other points raised by the

  applicants;

- held unanimously that Belgium was to pay Mr Bricmont the

  sum of 274 335 Belgian francs and 95 centimes for costs and expenses;

- dismissed unanimously the remainder of the claim for

  just satisfaction;

Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers

concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention;

Having invited the Government of Belgium to inform it of the measures which had

been taken in consequence of the judgment of 7 July 1989, having regard to its

obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide by it;

Having satisfied itself that the Government of Belgium has paid the applicant

the sum provided for in the judgment of 7 July 1989,

Declares that it has exercised its functions under Article 54 (art. 54) of the

Convention in this case.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255