The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

(hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),

Having regard to the report drawn up on 18 October 1995 by the European

Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the

Convention relating to the application lodged on 29 April 1992 by Mr Karl

Schottenberger against Austria (Application No. 20223/92);

Whereas on 23 November 1995 the Commission transmitted the said report to

the Committee of Ministers and whereas the case has not been referred to the

European Court of Human Rights, either by the Commission or by a state entitled

to do so under Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention, within the time-limit of

three months from the transmission of the report to the Chairman of the

Committee of Ministers; considering, however, that within this time-limit, the

applicant seized the Court in accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the

screening panel of the Court decided on 24 April 1996 that this case would not

be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now

called upon to take a decision in accordance with Article 32

(art. 32) of the Convention and with Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention as

amended by Article 5 of Protocol No. 9 (P9-5) for those states having ratified

the latter;

Whereas in his application, declared admissible by the Commission on 17

January 1995, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain civil

proceedings before social security courts;

Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion

that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the

Convention;

Whereas, at the 567th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 14 June

1996, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the

Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32,

paragraph 1

(art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of

Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention,

Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this

case;

Decides to pursue the examination of the present case, in accordance with

Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention with a view to adopting the final

resolution.