Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

LAGLER II AGAINST AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 16942/90 • ECHR ID: 001-51389

Document date: June 25, 1996

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

LAGLER II AGAINST AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 16942/90 • ECHR ID: 001-51389

Document date: June 25, 1996

Cited paragraphs only



The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32

(art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),

Having regard to the report drawn up on 6 September 1995 by the European

Commission of Human Rights in accordance with

Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 19

July 1990 by Mr Gert Lagler against Austria (Application No. 16942/90);

Whereas on 16 October 1995 the Commission transmitted the said report to

the Committee of Ministers and whereas the case has not been referred to the

European Court of Human Rights, either by the Commission or by a state entitled

to do so under Article 48

(art. 48) of the Convention, within the time-limit of three months from the

transmission of the report to the Chairman of the Committee of Ministers;

considering, however, that within this time-limit, the applicant seized the

Court in accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the

Court decided on 24 April 1996 that this case would not be considered by the

Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called upon to take a

decision in accordance with Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention and with

Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention as amended by Article 5 of Protocol No. 9

(P9-5) for those states having ratified the latter;

Whereas in his application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 13

April 1994, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain civil

proceedings;

Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion

that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the

Convention;

Whereas, at the 567th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 14 June

1996, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the

Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32,

paragraph 1

(art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of

Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention,

Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this

case;

Decides to pursue the examination of the present case, in accordance with

Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention with a view to adopting the final

resolution.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846