Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

FELICI AGAINST LUXEMBOURG

Doc ref: 21903/93 • ECHR ID: 001-51386

Document date: June 25, 1996

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

FELICI AGAINST LUXEMBOURG

Doc ref: 21903/93 • ECHR ID: 001-51386

Document date: June 25, 1996

Cited paragraphs only



The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

(hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),

Having regard to the report drawn up on 29 November 1995 by the European

Commission of Human Rights in accordance with

Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 11

March 1993 by Mr Michel Felici against Luxembourg (Application No. 21903/93);

Whereas on 19 December 1995 the Commission transmitted the said report to

the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for

in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without

the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in

pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;

Whereas in his application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 5

April 1995 (final decision as to the admissibility), the applicant complained

that the judicial authorities had refused his request to confront prosecution

witnesses in the course of criminal proceedings against him at the end of which

he was convicted;

Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion

that there had been no violation of Article 6, paragraphs 1 and 3.d (art. 6-1,

art. 6-3-d), of the Convention;

Whereas on 14 June 1996, at the 567th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies,

the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the

Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32,

paragraph 1

(art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had not been in this case a violation

of Article 6, paragraphs 1 and 3.d (art. 6-1,

art. 6-3-d), of the Convention,

Declares that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of

the Convention in this case;

Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this

case.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846