Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

AL MARADNI, GAMBA, PUGLIESE AND JASPARRO AGAINST ITALY

Doc ref: 16387/90;16388/90;19999/92;22102/93 • ECHR ID: 001-51541

Document date: September 13, 1996

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

AL MARADNI, GAMBA, PUGLIESE AND JASPARRO AGAINST ITALY

Doc ref: 16387/90;16388/90;19999/92;22102/93 • ECHR ID: 001-51541

Document date: September 13, 1996

Cited paragraphs only



The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

(hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),

Having regard to the report drawn up on 18 October 1995 by the European

Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the

Convention relating to the applications lodged respectively on 30 November 1989,

4 December 1989, 2 March 1992 and 18 March 1993 by Mr Mohamed Nabil Al Maradni,

Mr Renato Gamba,

Mr Massimo Pugliese and Mr Michele Jasparro against Italy (Applications Nos.

16387/90, 16388/90, 19999/92 and 22102/93);

Whereas on 28 November 1995 the Commission transmitted the said report to

the Committee of Ministers and whereas the case has not been referred to the

European Court of Human Rights, either by the Commission or by a state entitled

to do so under Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention, within the time-limit of

three months from the transmission of the report to the Chairman of the

Committee of Ministers; considering, however, that within this time-limit, two

of the applicants, Mr Mohamed Nabil Al Maradni and Mr Renato Gamba, seized the

Court in accordance with

Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 24 May

1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee

of Ministers is therefore now called upon to take a decision in accordance with

Article 32

(art. 32) of the Convention and with Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention as

amended by Article 5 of Protocol No. 9 (P9-5) for those states having ratified

the latter;

Whereas in their application, declared admissible by the Commission on 6

April 1995 (final decision as to the admissibility), the applicants complained

of the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings;

Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion

that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the

Convention;

Whereas, at the 571st meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 4

September 1996, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed

by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of

Article 32, paragraph 1

(art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of

Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention,

Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this

case;

Decides to pursue the examination of the present case in accordance with

Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention with a view to adopting the final

resolution.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846