HAYOT AND SOCIETE CARAÏBE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT AGAINST FRANCE
Doc ref: 19053/91 • ECHR ID: 001-50842
Document date: September 17, 1997
- 0 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 1 Outbound citations:
INTERIM RESOLUTION DH (97) 474
HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATION No. 19053/91 HAYOT AND SOCIÉTÉ CARAÏBE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT AGAINST FRANCE
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 September 1997 at the 599th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),
Having regard to the report drawn up on 5 September 1995 by the European Commission of Human Rights, in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention, relating to the application lodged on 22 July 1991 by Mr Raymond Hayot and the Société Caraïbe de Développement against France (Application No. 19053/91);
Whereas on 23 October 1995 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1, of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 of the Convention;
Whereas in their application, declared admissible by the Commission on 27 June 1994, the applicants complained about the excessive length of certain proceedings before administrative courts and about a violation of their right to respect for their possessions;
Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention and, by 25 votes to 1, the opinion that there had been no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;
Whereas, at the 559th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, the Committee of Ministers, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1, of the Convention, and agreed with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, by decision adopted on 22 March 1996, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention and that there had been no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;
Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case,
Decides to pursue the examination of the present case, in accordance with Article 32 of the Convention with a view to adopting the final resolution.