Resolution ResDH (2001)169 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 2 August 2000 (final on 2 November 2000) in the case of Cherakrak against France

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 December 2001 at the 775 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Cherakrak case delivered on 2 August 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 34075/96) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 24 July 1996 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Djamel Cherakrak , a French national, and that the Court, seized of the case under Article 5, paragraph 2, of Protocol No. 11, declared admissible the complaint that the length of certain criminal proceedings was excessive; Whereas in its judgment of 2 August 2000 the Court unanimously: - held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention; - held that the finding of violation constituted in itself sufficient just satisfaction as regards non-pecuniary damage; Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention; Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 2 August 2000, having regard to France’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by it; Whereas during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the government of the respondent state indicated that the Court’s judgment had been sent out to the authorities directly concerned, Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of France, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case.