Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

THREE CASES AGAINST ITALY (SEE APPENDIX) RELATING TO THE FAILURE TO ENFORCE JUDICIAL EVICTION ORDERS AGAINST TENANTS

Doc ref: 36112/97;38043/97;35001/97 • ECHR ID: 001-56334

Document date: June 17, 2003

  • Inbound citations: 6
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

THREE CASES AGAINST ITALY (SEE APPENDIX) RELATING TO THE FAILURE TO ENFORCE JUDICIAL EVICTION ORDERS AGAINST TENANTS

Doc ref: 36112/97;38043/97;35001/97 • ECHR ID: 001-56334

Document date: June 17, 2003

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution ResDH (2003)113

concerning the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights of 7 November 2002 (Friendly settlements) in three cases against Italy (see Appendix) relating to the failure to enforce judicial eviction orders against tenants

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 June 2003 at the 841st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),

Having regard to the final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the three cases listed in the Appendix to this Resolution, which were delivered on 7 November 2002 and transmitted at the same date to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;

Recalling that these cases originated in applications (see Appendix) against Italy, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights between 22 November 1995 and 30 May 1997 under former Article 25 of the Co n vention by two Italian nationals and an Italian limited liability company, and that the Court, seised of the cases under Article 5, paragraph 2, of Protocol No. 11, declared admissible the applicants’ complaints concerning their prolonged inability to recover possession of their apartments, through lack of police assistance in enforcing judicial eviction orders against the tenants as well as the excessive length of the eviction proceedings;

Whereas in the judgments concerning these cases the Court, after having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols, decided unanimously to strike these cases out of its list and took note of the parties’ undertaking not to request a re-hearing of the cases before the Grand Chamber;

Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlements it was agreed that the Italian Government would pay the applicants certain sums (see Appendix), within three months as from the notification of the judgments;

Recalling that Rule 44, paragraph 2, of the Rules of the Court provides that the striking out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee of Ministers once it has become final in order to allow it to supervise, in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 2 of the Convention, the execution of any undertakings which may have been attached to the discontinuance or solution of the matter;

Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;

Having satisfied itself that on 10 February 2003, three days after the expiry of the time-limit set, the government of the respondent state had paid the applicants the sums provided for in the friendly settlement and having taken note of the fact that, in view of the minimal sum involved , the applicants had waived their right to default interest, and that no other measure was required in the present cases to conform to the Court’s judgment;

Recalling that, as regards the applicants’ complaints declared admissible in these cases, the Committee of Ministers is at present supervising the execution of several judgments of the Court (in particular the judgment Immobiliare Saffi of 28 July 1999) and decisions of Committee of Ministers, under former Article 32 of the Convention, finding in particular a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of judicial orders for eviction of tenants;

Whereas, in this connection, the Italian authorities informed the Committee of Ministers that they were envisaging new general measures (in addition to the adoption, in December 1998, of the law No. 431/98 “Regulations concerning the renting and the repossession of housing”, which sets inter alia the conditions, modalities and deadlines for the implementation of eviction proceedings) in order to put to an end the serious problem of non-enforcement of judicial eviction orders, so as to prevent new violations similar to those already found in the above-mentioned cases,

Declares, on the basis of the information supplied by the Government of Italy, that the Committee of Ministers has exe r cised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention with respect to the commitments subscribed to in the friendly settlements reached in these cases.

Appendix to Resolution ResDH (2003)113

Details of just satisfaction awarded to the applicants

Case

Total sum

C. SRL

36112/97

11 000 euros

CICCONE Stefania

38043/97

7 000 euros

FRANCESCHETTI Ilaria

35001/97

9 000 euros

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707