Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF MUONIO SAAMI VILLAGE AGAINST SWEDEN

Doc ref: 28222/95 • ECHR ID: 001-56256

Document date: June 17, 2003

  • Inbound citations: 3
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF MUONIO SAAMI VILLAGE AGAINST SWEDEN

Doc ref: 28222/95 • ECHR ID: 001-56256

Document date: June 17, 2003

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution ResDH (2003)120

concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 9 January 2001 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Muonio Saami Village against Sweden

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 June 2003 at the 841st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),

Having regard to the final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Muonio Saami Village case delivered on 9 January 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;

Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 28222/95) against Sweden, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 7 October 1994 under former Article 25 of the Co n vention by a Swedish village, Muonio Saami , and that the Court, seised of the case under Article 5, paragraph 2, of Protocol No. 11, declared admissible its complaint according to which its case concerning the granting of permits for herding reindeer had not been examined by an independent tribunal;

Whereas in its judgment of 9 January 2001 the Court, after having taken formal note of a friendly settlement reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicant village, and having been satisfied that the settlement was based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided unanimously to strike the case out of its list and took note of the parties’ undertaking not to request a re-hearing of the case before the Grand Chamber;

Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlement it was agreed that [the Government of Sweden would pay the applicant village the global sum of 65 000 Swedish crowns;

Recalling that Rule 44, paragraph 2, of the Rules of the Court provides that the striking-out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee of Ministers once it has become final in order to allow it to supervise, in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 2 of the Convention, the execution of any undertakings which may have been attached to the discontinuance or solution of the matter;

Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;

Having satisfied itself that on 15 January 2001 the government of the respondent state had paid the applicant village the sum provided for in the friendly settlement and that no other measure was required in the present case to conform to the Court’s judgment,

Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of Sweden, that it has exe r cised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846