CASE OF CAVUSOGLU AGAINST TURKEY
Doc ref: 32983/96 • ECHR ID: 001-56305
Document date: October 20, 2003
- Inbound citations: 4
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution ResDH (2003)170
concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 6 March 2001 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Çavuşoğlu against Turkey
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 October 2003 at the 854th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),
Having regard to the final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Çavuşoğlu case delivered on 6 March 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;
Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 32983/96) against Turkey, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 26 August 1996 under former Article 25 of the Co n vention by Mr Özgür Çavuşoğlu , a Turkish national, and that the Court, seised of the case under Article 5, paragraph 2, of Protocol No. 11, declared admissible the complaint relating to alleged ill-treatment inflicted upon the applicant while he was detained in police custody in November 1995 in Izmir ;
Whereas in its judgment of 6 March 2001 the Court, after having taken formal note of a friendly settlement reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicant, and having been satisfied that the settlement was based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided unanimously to strike the case out of its list and took note of the parties’ undertaking not to request a re-hearing of the case before the Grand Chamber;
Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlement it was agreed that the Government of Turkey would pay the applicant the global sum of 75 000 French francs (namely the sum of 11 433,68 euros), in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages as well as costs and expenses as soon as the judgment is notified;
Recalling that Rule 44, paragraph 2, of the Rules of Court provides that the striking-out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee of Ministers once it has become final in order to allow it to supervise, in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 2 of the Convention, the execution of any undertakings which may have been attached to the discontinuance or solution of the matter;
Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;
Having satisfied itself that on 18 May 2001 the government of the respondent state had paid the applicant the sum provided for in the friendly settlement and that no other measure was required in the present case to conform to the Court’s judgment,
Declares, after having examined the information supplied by the Government of Turkey, that it has exe r cised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case.
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
