CASE OF 8 CASES AGAINST TURKEY CONCERNING FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN STATE OF EMERGENCY REGION
Doc ref: 50693/99;38323/02;75512/01;57225/00;71459/01;60608/00;51041/99;74243/01 • ECHR ID: 001-95514
Document date: September 30, 2009
- 25 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 0 Outbound citations:
Resolution CM/ ResDH (2009)101 [1]
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in
8 cases against Turkey concerning freedom of expression in state of emergency region
(See Appendix for details of the cases)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);
Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final;
Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in these cases concern in particular unjustified interference in the applicants ’ freedom of expression due to bans imposed under article 11 e) of Law No. 2935 on the state of emergency, concerning the introduction and/or publication and/or distribution of newspapers or political posters, and absence of a judicial remedy to challenge the orders of the governor of the region of state of emergency (Violations of Articles 10 and 13) (see details in Appendix).
Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the mea s ures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Conve n tion to abide by the judgments;
Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee ’ s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;
Having satisfied itself that, the respondent state paid the a p plicants the just satisfaction provided in the judgments (see details in Appendix),
Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded in the judgments, the adoption by the respondent state, where appropriate, of
- individual measures to put an end to the violations and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- general measures preventing, similar violations;
Having examined the measures taken by the respondent state to that effect, the details of which appear in Appendix;
Recalling that in its Final Resolution CM/ ResDH (2007)97 of 20 June 2007 the Committee of Ministers decided to close the examination of 6 similar cases;
DECLARES, having examined the measures taken by the respondent state (see Appendix), that it has exe r cised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.
Appendix to Resolution CM/ ResDH (2009)101
Information about the measures to comply with the judgments in 8 cases against Turkey concerning freedom of expression in state of emergency region
Introductory case summary
These cases concern in particular the unjustified interferences in the applicants ’ freedom of expression due to bans imposed under article 11 e) of Law No. 2935 on the state of emergency and/or Article 1 a) of the Legislative Decree No. 430 on the measures to be taken during the state of emergency, concerning the introduction and/or publication and/or distribution of newspapers or political posters in the region subject to the state of emergency, and absence of a judicial remedy to challenge the orders of the governor of the state of emergency region (violations of Articles 10 and 13).
According to Article 7 of Legislative Decree No. 285 declaring the state of emergency, no administrative decision taken by the governor of a region under the state of emergency rule was subject to judicial review.
a) Details of just satisfaction
Name and application number
Pecuniary damage
Non-pecuniary damage
Costs and expenses
Total
Halis DoÄŸan and others 50693/99
-
EUR 12000
EUR 2000
EUR 14000
Paid on 10/07/2006
Mehmet Çolak 38323/02
-
EUR 2000
EUR 1250
EUR 3250
Paid on 06/12/2007
Demirel and others 75512/01
No just satisfaction awarded.
Tüzel 57225/00
-
EUR 1500
EUR 1000
EUR 2500
Paid on 26/07/2006
Tüzel (No. 2) 71459/01
-
EUR 1500
EUR 1000
EUR 2500
Paid on 27/05/2007
Mehmet Emin Yıldız and others 60608/00
-
EUR 7500
EUR 815
EUR 8315
Paid on 13/10/2006
Saygılı and Seyman 51041/99
-
EUR 5000
EUR 1500
EUR 6500
Paid on 21/12/2006
Fevzi Saygılı 74243/01,71459/01
-
EUR 2500
-
EUR 2500
Paid on 24/06/2008
b) Individual measures
In these cases individual measures are linked to general measures.
Legislative Decree No. 285 declaring the state of emergency was lifted in November 2002. Since the decree is no longer in force, current legislation provides sufficient safeguards to all individuals for grievances under the Convention (See Final Resolution CM/ ResDH (2007)97) .
In addition the judgments of the European Court were translated and circulated to the relevant authorities.
The government considers that these measures prevent similar violations and that Turkey has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
[1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 September 2009 at the 1065 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies