CASE OF MERAL AND 10 OTHER CASES AGAINST TURKEY
Doc ref: 33446/02;19728/02;9907/02;10971/05;38012/03;41296/04;6162/04;37829/05;2841/05;27080/08;57711/08 • ECHR ID: 001-116578
Document date: December 6, 2012
- Inbound citations: 45
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 4
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution CM/ ResDH (2012) 226 [1] 11 cases against Turkey
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Case
Application
Judgment of
Final on
MERAL
33446/02
27/11/2007
Loading citations...02/06/2008
AKGÃœL
19728/02
17/7/2008
17/10/2008
ARAÇ
9907/02
23/09/2008
23/12/2008
EKMEKÇI AND OTHERS
2841/05+
26/05/2009
26/08/2009
ERCÄ°YAS
10971/05
27/09/2011
27/12/2011
HASIRCI
38012/03
24/03/2009
06/07/2009
KARADUMAN AND TANDOÄžAN
41296/04
03/06/2008
17/09/2008
KÖKSAL AND DURDU
27080/08+
15/06/2010
15/09/2010
POSLU AND OTHERS
6162/04
08/06/2010
08/09/2010
TUKSAL AND OTHERS
57711/08+
21/09/2010
21/12/2010
YILMAZ MELEK SIMA
37829/05
30/09/2008
06/04/2009
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in these cases concern the unfairness of domestic proceedings due to the failure by courts to provide the applicants with a copy of the written opinion of Public Prosecutor before the Council of State and the excessive length of domestic proceedings (in the cases of Köksal and Durdu (27080/08), Erciyas (10971/05) and Ekmekçi (2841/05)) (violations of article 6, paragraph 1);
Recalling that the respondent State ’ s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide to by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action reports provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see documents DH-DD(2012 ) 765E and DH-DD(2012) 8 93E );
Noting that the necessary general measures concerning the excessive length of domestic proceedings in Köksal and Durdu (27080/08), Erciyas (10971/05) and Ekmekçi (2841/05) cases, are being examined in the context of Ormancı group of cases and Ümmühan Kaplan pilot judgment (24240/07) and that the domestic proceedings in these cases are terminated;
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.
[1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 December 2012 at the 11 57 th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies .