Search
document

CASE OF ADONYI AND 10 OTHER CASES AGAINST HUNGARY

Doc ref: 74201/11;388/12;51004/13;20108/11;22286/11;4340/12;45543/11;58893/13;63676/11;15815/12;65612/11 • ECHR ID: 001-162437

Document date: April 13, 2016

Inbound citations: 12
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF ADONYI AND 10 OTHER CASES AGAINST HUNGARY

Doc ref: 74201/11;388/12;51004/13;20108/11;22286/11;4340/12;45543/11;58893/13;63676/11;15815/12;65612/11 • ECHR ID: 001-162437

Document date: April 13, 2016

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (2016) 62 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Eleven cases against Hungary

Application No.

Case

Date of the decision

74201/11

Ivánné ADONYI

20/10/2015

388/12

Suleiman AL-SAIRAFI

08/09/2015

51004/13

Sándorné DÚCS AND OTHERS

20/10/2015

20108/11

Sabine Geraldine FEHÉR

08/09/2015

22286/11

Istvánné HORVÁTH

07/07/2015

4340/12

László KÁROLY

08/09/2015

45543/11

Gyuláné KECSKÉS AND OTHERS

07/07/2015

58893/13

Zoltán SIPŐCZ

07/07/2015

63676/11

Béláné TAKÁCS

07/07/2015

15815/12

László VARGA

08/09/2015

65612/11

Stella ZUHATAGI-FÉSŰ

20/10/2015

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 April 2016 at the 1253rd meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;

Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and

DECIDES to close their examination.

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant