Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF BJELAJAC AND 10 OTHER CASES AGAINST SERBIA

Doc ref: 6282/06;14145/04;14011/07;30132/04;42559/08;17556/05;63398/13;33888/05;25959/06;39177/05;37343/05 • ECHR ID: 001-164154

Document date: June 8, 2016

  • Inbound citations: 192
  • Cited paragraphs: 3
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF BJELAJAC AND 10 OTHER CASES AGAINST SERBIA

Doc ref: 6282/06;14145/04;14011/07;30132/04;42559/08;17556/05;63398/13;33888/05;25959/06;39177/05;37343/05 • ECHR ID: 001-164154

Document date: June 8, 2016

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH ( 2016)152

Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

Eleven cases against Serbia

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

6282/06

BJELAJAC

18/09/2012

18/12/2012

14145/04

BULOVIĆ

01/04/2008

01/07/2008

14011/07

FELBAB

14/04/2009

14/09/2009

30132/04

ILIĆ

09/10/2007

09/01/2008

42559/08

KRIVOÅ EJ

13/04/2010

13/07/2010

17556/05

MARČIĆ AND 16 OTHERS

30/10/2007

30/01/2008

63398/13+

POP-ILI Ć AND OTHERS

14/10/2014

14/01/2015

33888/05

POPOVIĆ

24/11/2009

28/06/2010

25959/06

TOMIĆ

26/06/2007

26/09/2007

39177/05

V.A.M.

13/03/2007

13/06/2007

37343/05

ZIT COMPANY

27/11/2007

27/02/2008

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 June 2016 at the 1259th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required :

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having noted that the just satisfaction, where awarded, has been paid by the government of the respondent State and that no other individual measure is necessary in these cases;

Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the general measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments (see the decision of the Committee of Ministers adopted at its 1259th meeting (June 2016) (DH));

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted;

Noting that the Committee will continue to supervise the measures required in the context of the remaining cases of the EVT Company group,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 396058 • Paragraphs parsed: 43415240 • Citations processed 3359795