Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF ORCHOWSKI AND 6 OTHER CASES AGAINST POLAND

Doc ref: 17885/04;17599/05;18364/06;3390/05;38719/09;21880/03;29254/06 • ECHR ID: 001-167361

Document date: September 21, 2016

  • Inbound citations: 212
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF ORCHOWSKI AND 6 OTHER CASES AGAINST POLAND

Doc ref: 17885/04;17599/05;18364/06;3390/05;38719/09;21880/03;29254/06 • ECHR ID: 001-167361

Document date: September 21, 2016

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (2016) 254 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Seven cases against Poland

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

17885/04

ORCHOWSKI

22/10/2009

22/01/2010

17599/05

NORBERT SIKORSKI

22/10/2009

22/01/2010

18364/06

GRZYWACZEWSKI

31/05/2012

31/08/2012

3390/05

MIROSŁAW ZIELIŃSKI

20/09/2011

20/12/2011

38719/09

WENERSKI No. 2

24/07/2012

24/10/2012

21880/03

OLSZEWSKI

02/04/2013

02/07/2013

29254/06

KARABIN

07/01/2014

07/01/2014

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 21 September 2016 at the 1265 th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2016)791 );

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255