Resolution CM/ ResDH (2017)11 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Three cases against Turkey

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 January 2017 at the 1275 th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

37601/02

SENYÃœCEL AND OTHERS

16/07/2015

16/07/2015

37616/02

KÖSE

07/12/2010

07/03/2011

14155/02

MEHMET YLDIZ AND OTHERS

01/02/2011

01/05/2011

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2016)1239 );

Recalling that within the context of the Aka group of cases the Committee closed the examination of the same violation concerning the administration ’ s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation of the applicants ’ land (see Final Resolution ResDH (2001)70 );

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.