CASE OF PANTEA AND 4 OTHER CASES AGAINST ROMANIA
Doc ref: 33343/96;22383/03;34022/05;38511/03;36632/04 • ECHR ID: 001-174768
Document date: June 7, 2017
- Inbound citations: 41
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution CM/ ResDH (2017)164 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Five cases against Romania
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 7 June 2017 at the 1288 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
33343/96
PANTEA
03/06/2003
03/09/2003
22383/03
L.Z.
03/02/2009
03/05/2009
34022/05
RADU ALEXANDRU MARIUS
21/07/2009
21/10/2009
38511/03
BOROANCÄ‚
22/06/2010
22/09/2010
36632/04
ANTOCHI
12/07/2011
28/11/2011
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2016)756 );
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.