CASE OF KOOTTUMMEL AND 5 OTHER CASES AGAINST AUSTRIA
Doc ref: 49616/06;4490/06;34821/06;22635/09;23396/09;19844/08 • ECHR ID: 001-175755
Document date: July 5, 2017
- Inbound citations: 34
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 1
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution CM/ ResDH (2017)199 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Six cases against Austria
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 5 July 2017 at the 1291 st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
49616/06
KOOTTUMMEL
10/12/2009
10/03/2010
4490/06
RICHTER
18/12/2008
Loading citations...18/03/2009
34821/06
GABRIEL
01/04/2010
01/07/2010
22635/09
WILLROIDER
05/12/2013
05/12/2013
23396/09
DENK
05/12/2013
05/12/2013
19844/08
BECKER
11/06/2015
11/09/2015
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2017)638 );
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.