Search
document

CASE OF BALATON AIRPORT KFT AGAINST HUNGARY AND 22 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 21177/11, 24442/10, 2778/12, 60924/11, 71483/11, 75775/11, 67997/11, 49154/11, 75177/11, 43982/11, 7... • ECHR ID: 001-177897

Document date: October 4, 2017

Inbound citations: 23
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF BALATON AIRPORT KFT AGAINST HUNGARY AND 22 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 21177/11, 24442/10, 2778/12, 60924/11, 71483/11, 75775/11, 67997/11, 49154/11, 75177/11, 43982/11, 7... • ECHR ID: 001-177897

Document date: October 4, 2017

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (2017)306 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights 23 cases against Hungary

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 October 2017 at the 1296 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Date of the decision

21177/11

BALATON AIRPORT KFT

15/03/2016

24442/10

Lászlóné DARÁZSI AND 12 OTHER APPLICATIONS

30/06/2016

2778/12

Éva ECHTER

08/03/2016

60924/11

Rita FINTOR

15/03/2016

71483/11

Gyula HALMAI AND László VÁRADI

24/05/2016

75775/11

Miklós János JÁMBOR

19/04/2016

67997/11

K.I.G.

19/01/2016

49154/11

István KALMÁR

19/01/2016

75177/11

György KARIKÁS

19/01/2016

43982/11

Péter András KAZÁR

19/01/2016

72882/11

Zsolt KULCSÁR

19/01/2016

42971/11

P.O.

19/01/2016

57665/11

S.B.

19/01/2016

67593/11

István SOMKUTI

19/01/2016

40743/12

Sándor STUBER

21/06/2016

70252/11

Péter SÜMEGI

19/01/2016

78514/11

Zoltán SZABÓ AND OTHERS

09/02/2016

55883/11

Katalin SZÁSZ

19/01/2016

55810/11

György SZILVÁSY

19/01/2016

54600/11

Karoly SZITTNER

19/01/2016

16472/12

Attila VASZI AND OTHERS

09/02/2016

49135/11

Tibor VIDUS

19/01/2016

77042/11

György WIENER

19/01/2016

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;

Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and

DECIDES to close their examination.

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant