Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL AGAINST UKRAINE

Doc ref: 33014/05 • ECHR ID: 001-181057

Document date: February 7, 2018

  • Inbound citations: 18
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL AGAINST UKRAINE

Doc ref: 33014/05 • ECHR ID: 001-181057

Document date: February 7, 2018

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (2018)49 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Editorial Board of Pravoye Delo and Shtekel against Ukraine

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 7 February 2018 at the 1306 th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

33014/05

EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL

05/05/2011

05/08/2011

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violations established;

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgment, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2018)22 );

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255