Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF ARAPOVIĆ AGAINST SLOVENIA AND 15 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 37927/12, 6625/10, 50844/12, 6000/10, 7054/10, 6687/10, 5747/10, 5773/10, 6234/10, 5738/10, 5741/10,... • ECHR ID: 001-182038

Document date: March 15, 2018

  • Inbound citations: 40
  • Cited paragraphs: 1
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF ARAPOVIĆ AGAINST SLOVENIA AND 15 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 37927/12, 6625/10, 50844/12, 6000/10, 7054/10, 6687/10, 5747/10, 5773/10, 6234/10, 5738/10, 5741/10,... • ECHR ID: 001-182038

Document date: March 15, 2018

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (2018)101 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 16 cases against Slovenia

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 March 2018 at the 1310 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

37927/12

ARAPOVIĆ

29/10/2015

29/10/2015

6625/10

BEGANOVIĆ

03/04/2014

03/04/2014

50844/12

BELJKAÅ

29/10/2015

29/10/2015

6000/10

BRLEK

06/11/2014

06/11/2014

7054/10

ČETIĆ

27/02/2014

27/02/2014

6687/10

FAGANEL

06/11/2014

06/11/2014

5747/10

JEVÅ NIK

09/01/2014

09/01/2014

5773/10

MASELJ

06/11/2014

06/11/2014

6234/10

PRAZNIK

28/06/2012

28/09/2012

5738/10

ŠABIĆ

03/04/2014

03/04/2014

5741/10

ŠEMIĆ

05/06/2014

05/06/2014

6120/10

SLEMENÅ EK

03/04/2014

03/04/2014

5903/10+

Å TRUCL AND OTHERS

20/10/2011

20/01/2012

6011/10

Å TRUKELJ

27/02/2014

27/02/2014

5998/10

PETROVIĆ

06/11/2014

06/11/2014

29998/10

PUZIN

06/11/2014

06/11/2014

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of poor conditions of detention in the Ljubljana prison and the lack of an effective domestic remedy (violations of Articles 3 and 13);

Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2018)182 );

Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved, given that the applicants have been released;

Recalling that as a result of the comprehensive and multifaceted approach adopted by the authorities of the respondent State to combat overcrowding, each prisoner in the Ljubljana prison is currently afforded at least 4.5 square metres of living space;

Recalling further that the authorities of the respondent State introduced a preventive remedy enabling judicial protection in cases of poor conditions of detention for convicted prisoners as well as an effective compensatory remedy for released prisoners;

Noting that the respondent State has recently introduced a preventive remedy enabling judicial protection to complain about poor conditions of detention for remand prisoners;

Noting that the issue of effective compensatory remedies for convicted and remand prisoners remains under examination within the framework of the Mand ić and Jović case (Application No. 5774/10) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in relation to this issue;

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255