Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF DUFOORT AGAINST BELGIUM AND 8 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 43653/09;53448/10;43687/09;43733/09;43663/09;28785/11;50658/09;330/09;49861/12 • ECHR ID: 001-186858

Document date: September 20, 2018

  • Inbound citations: 25
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF DUFOORT AGAINST BELGIUM AND 8 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 43653/09;53448/10;43687/09;43733/09;43663/09;28785/11;50658/09;330/09;49861/12 • ECHR ID: 001-186858

Document date: September 20, 2018

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (2018)350 Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Nine cases against Belgium

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 September 2018 at the 1324 th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

43653/09

DUFOORT

10/01/2013

10/04/2013

53448/10

SWENNEN

10/01/2013

10/04/2013

43687/09

CARYN

09/01/2014

09/04/2014

43733/09

GELAUDE

09/01/2014

09/04/2014

43663/09

OUKILI

09/01/2014

09/04/2014

28785/11

PLAISIER

09/01/2014

09/04/2014

50658/09

SAADOUNI

09/01/2014

09/04/2014

330/09

VAN MEROYE

09/01/2014

09/04/2014

49861/12+

VANDER VELDE ET SOUSSI

03/02/2015

03/02/2015

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the applicants ’ prolonged detention in prison psychiatric wings not offering care appropriate to their mental health disorders as well as the lack of an effective remedy to complain about this detention and obtain redress (violations of Articles 5, paragraph 1 in all cases and 5, paragraph 4 in some cases);

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having noted the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court and that the ten applicants in these cases are no longer in a prison psychiatric wing, one being definitively released and the others having been placed in a forensic psychiatric centre (see document DH-DD(2018)649 );

Considering that the question of individual measures has therefore been resolved in these nine cases;

Recalling that the examination of the general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these cases continues within the framework of the W.D. pilot judgment, the L.B. judgment and the other judgments belonging to this group; that the closure of these nine cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee ’ s evaluation of these measures;

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and;

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255