Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF FURMAN AGAINST SLOVENIA AND AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 16608/09 • ECHR ID: 001-192418

Document date: March 27, 2019

  • Inbound citations: 7
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF FURMAN AGAINST SLOVENIA AND AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 16608/09 • ECHR ID: 001-192418

Document date: March 27, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (2019)67 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Furman against Slovenia and Austria

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 27 March 2019 at the 1342 nd meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

16608/09

FURMAN

05/02/2015

05/05/2015

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established;

Recalling that the European Court established a violation in respect of Slovenia and declared the application inadmissible regarding the complaint against Austria;

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document ( DH-DD(2019)87 );

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 396058 • Paragraphs parsed: 43415240 • Citations processed 3359795