Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF BARANOV AND OTHERS AGAINST RUSSIA AND 11 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 60993/16, 63314/16, 64049/16, 70695/16, 1014/17, 2704/17, 4725/17, 12639/17, 1484/16, 44694/13, 1492... • ECHR ID: 001-194048

Document date: June 6, 2019

  • Inbound citations: 162
  • Cited paragraphs: 2
  • Outbound citations: 1

CASE OF BARANOV AND OTHERS AGAINST RUSSIA AND 11 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 60993/16, 63314/16, 64049/16, 70695/16, 1014/17, 2704/17, 4725/17, 12639/17, 1484/16, 44694/13, 1492... • ECHR ID: 001-194048

Document date: June 6, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (201 9 ) 151 Execution of the judgment s of the European Court of Human Rights 12 cases against Russian Federation

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 June 2019 at the 1348 h meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)

Application

Case

Judgment of

Final on

60993/16

BARANOV AND OTHERS

08/02/2018

08/02/2018

12639/17

GORSHKOV AND OTHERS

14/06/2018

14/06/2018

1484/16

IZYUROV AND KUKHARCHUK

28/06/2018

28/06/2018

44694/13

KOLESNIKOVICH

12/09/2016

12/09/2016

14925/16

LOGINOV AND OTHERS

22/02/2018

22/02/2018

55427/13

MALYGIN AND OTHERS

22/02/2018

22/02/2018

16401/12

MOZHAROV AND OTHERS

18/09/2017

18/09/2017

19538/10

NICHEPORUK AND OTHERS

29/03/2018

29/03/2018

28262/07

NOVINSKIY AND OTHERS

14/12/2017

14/12/2017

45498/11

SKLYAR

18/07/2017

11/12/2017

38884/13

VILKOV AND OTHERS

20/07/2017

20/07/2017

8306/10

ZELENKOV AND OTHERS

28/09/2017

28/09/2017

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established mainly on account of poor conditions of detention in detention facilities under the authority of the Ministries of Justice and of the Interior, the lack of adequate medical care, and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in both respects (violations of Articles 3 and 13);

Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the information provided by the government in respect of the individual measures including as regards the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;

Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved, given that the applicants have either been released or, where applicable, provided with the necessary medical care, and that all necessary individual measures have also been taken in respect of the other violations found by the Court;

Recalling that the question of the general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Kalashnikov group (Application No. 47095/99 ) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in this group;

Recalling also that the general measures required in response to the other violations found in some of these cases are or were examined by the Committee in the cases or groups of Klyakhin , Guliyev , and Svinarenko and Slyadnev ,

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in th ese case s and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 393980 • Paragraphs parsed: 42814632 • Citations processed 3216094