CASE OF AKAR AGAINST TURKEY AND 12 OTHER CASES
Doc ref: 28505/04, 43955/02, 39862/02, 53658/07, 22190/05, 38327/04, 15672/08, 37619/05, 25886/04, 4287/04, 6... • ECHR ID: 001-198789
Document date: November 13, 2019
- Inbound citations: 24
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 6
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution CM/ ResDH (2019) 306 Execution of the judgment s of the European Court of Human Rights 13 cases against Turkey
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 November 2019 at the 1 360 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
28505/04
AKAR
21/06/2011
21/09/2011
43955/02
ALÄ° GÃœZEL
21/10/2008
21/01/2009
39862/02
ALİ KOÇ
05/06/2007
05/09/2007
53658/07+
ÇALAN AND OTHERS
14/04/2015
Loading citations...14/04/2015
22190/05
KAPÇAK
22/09/2009
22/12/2009
38327/04
KOÇ AND OTHERS
30/09/2008
30/12/2008
15672/08
MEHMET NURI OZEN AND OTHERS
11/01/2011
11/04/2011
37619/05
MEHMET NURİ ÖZEN
02/02/2010
02/05/2010
25886/04
NAKÇI
30/09/2008
30/12/2008
4287/04
ÖZKARTAL
24/06/2008
24/09/2008
60123/00
REYAN (No.2)
23/09/2008
23/12/2008
9460/03
TAN
03/07/2007
03/10/2007
13692/03
TUR
11/06/2013
11/09/2013
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in the se cases mainly concern the right to respect for private life on account of unjustified interference of prison authorities with the applicant s’ correspondence in general ( violations of A rticle 8) ;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2019)479-rev );
Recalling that that the specific issue of unjustified interference of prison authorities with prisoners’ correspondence with their lawyer continues is being examined within the context of the Fazil Ahmet Tamer group a nd that the Committee of Ministers’ decisions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention are entirely without prejudice to the Court’s consideration of these cases ;
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1 have been adopted ;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.