Resolution CM/ ResDH (2019)352 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Five cases against Turkey

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 December 2019 at the 1363 rd meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

34478/97

FENER RUM ERKEK LISESI VAKFI

09/01/2007

09/04/2007

37639/03+

BOZCAADA KIMISIS TEODOKU RUM ORTODOKS KILISESI VAKFI

03/03/2009

03/06/2009

37646/03+

BOZCAADA KIMISIS TEODOKU RUM ORTODOKS KILISESI VAKFI NO. 2

06/10/2009

06/01/2010

1480/03

SAMATYA SURP KEVORK ERMENI KILISESI, MEKTEBI VE MEZARLIĞI VAKFI YÖNETIM KURULU

16/12/2008

16/03/2009

36165/02

YEKIDULE SURP PIRGIÇ ERMENI HASTANESI VAKFI

16/12/2008

16/03/2009

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2019)985 ) ;

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.