CASE OF ZHOGLO AGAINST UKRAINE AND 5 OTHER CASES
Doc ref: 17988/02;48016/06;16980/06;20963/08;31240/03;17551/02 • ECHR ID: 001-200885
Document date: January 22, 2020
- Inbound citations: 62
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 3
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution CM/ ResDH (2020)15
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Six cases against Ukraine
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 January 2020 at the 1365 th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
17988/02
ZHOGLO
24/04/2008
Loading citations...24/07/2008
48016/06+
SITNEVSKIY AND CHAYKOVSKIY
10/11/2016
10/02/2017
16980/06
PALCHIK
02/03/2017
03/07/2017
20963/08
BOYETS
30/01/2018
30/04/2018
31240/03
ZHUKOVSKIY
03/03/2011
15/09/2011
17551/02
KOLESNIK
19/11/2009
19/02/2010
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2019)1371 );
Recalling that the issues pertaining to violations of Article 6 regarding the right to defence and the privilege against self-incrimination, and principle of equality of arms continue to be examined within the framework of the Balitskiy group (Application No. 12793/03) and the Zhuk group (Application No. 45783/05) respectively,
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.