CASE OF ALICI AND OMAK AGAINST TURKEY AND 2 OTHER CASES
Doc ref: 57653/00;52083/99;27503/04 • ECHR ID: 001-203262
Document date: June 4, 2020
- 10 Inbound citations:
- •
- 1 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 0 Outbound citations:
Resolution CM/ ResDH (2020)85
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Three cases against Turkey
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 June 2020 at the 1377 th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
57653/00
ALICI AND OMAK
26/01/2010
26/04/2010
52083/99
MAÇIN
04/05/2006
04/08/2006
27503/04
YOLDAÅž
23/02/2010
23/05/2010
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2020)159 );
Recalling that the Committee closed its examination of other similar cases concerning the authorities ’ failure to present the applicants promptly and automatically before a judge and the absence of judicial remedy to challenge the lawfulness of their detention (see Final Resolution CM/ ResDH (2002)110 concerning the Sakık and others group of cases);
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.