Resolution CM/ ResDH (2020)102

Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

Mandi ć and Jović against Slovenia

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 June 2020 at the 1377 th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

5774/10

MANDIĆ AND JOVIĆ

20/01/2012

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violations established;

Having regard to Resolution CM/ ResDH (2018)101 in which the Committee closed its supervision to the issues related to poor conditions of detention, the lack of a preventive remedy in cases of poor conditions of detention for remand and convicted prisoners as well as the lack of a compensatory remedy for released prisoners;

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the remaining measures taken to ensure effective compensatory remedies for convicted and remand prisoners;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2020)284 );

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.