Search
document

CASE OF ANTONOVI AGAINST BULGARIA AND 10 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 20827/02;36772/06;78441/11;34272/09;9464/11;48929/12;3851/13;74787/01;9504/09;41090/12;5442/11 • ECHR ID: 001-203995

Document date: July 1, 2020

Inbound citations: 36
•
Cited paragraphs: 5
•
Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF ANTONOVI AGAINST BULGARIA AND 10 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 20827/02;36772/06;78441/11;34272/09;9464/11;48929/12;3851/13;74787/01;9504/09;41090/12;5442/11 • ECHR ID: 001-203995

Document date: July 1, 2020

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (2020)128

Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

11 cases against Bulgaria

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 1 July 2020 at the 1380 th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

20827/02

ANTONOVI

01/10/2009

01/03/2010

36772/06

BALEZDROVI

20/09/2011

78441/11

DIMITROV

24/11/2016

34272/09

DOBRODOLSKA

13/10/2016

9464/11

KALEV

10/11/2016

48929/12

KOPANKOVI

06/09/2018

06/12/2018

3851/13

KOSTOV

16/03/2017

74787/01

PARVANOV AND OTHERS

07/01/2010

07/04/2010

9504/09

PETROVI

13/10/2016

41090/12

RASHKOVA AND SIMEONSKA

02/02/2017

5442/11

RAYKOVA

13/10/2016

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violation established on account of the failure to provide compensation through property for expropriations which took place during the 1980s or the early 1990s (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1);

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2020)74 );

Considering that the question of individual measures was therefore resolved, given that the applicants were provided with the flats or garages due to them or received monetary payment for their value, as well as compensation for not being able to enjoy the flats/ garages due to them and for the delay in the procedure;

Recalling that the question of the general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Basmenkova group of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee ’ s evaluation of the general measures required;

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and

DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant