Search
document

Document text Analytics

CASE OF DI CICCIO v. ITALY

Doc ref: 29143/95 • ECHR ID: 001-99

Document date: May 16, 1997

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF DI CICCIO v. ITALY

Doc ref: 29143/95 • ECHR ID: 001-99

Document date: May 16, 1997

Cited paragraphs only

In the case of Di Ciccio v. Italy (1),

The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights,

constituted in accordance with Article 48 para. 2 (art. 48-2) of the

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

("the Convention") and Rule 26 of Rules of Court B (2),

_______________

Notes by the Registrar

1. The case is numbered 24/1997/808/1011. The first number is the

case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the

relevant year (second number). The last two numbers indicate the

case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court since its

creation and on the list of the corresponding originating applications

to the Commission.

2. Rules of Court B, which came into force on 2 October 1994, apply

to all cases concerning the States bound by Protocol No. 9 (P9).

________________

Sitting in private at Strasbourg on 22 April 1997, and composed

of the following judges:

Mr A. Spielmann, Chairman,

Mr C. Russo,

Mr J. De Meyer,

and also of Mr H. Petzold, Registrar,

Having regard to the application against the Italian Republic

lodged with the Court on 29 January 1997 by an Italian national,

Mr Michele Di Ciccio, within the three-month period laid down by

Article 32 para. 1 and Article 47 of the Convention (art. 32-1,

art. 47);

Noting that the applicant, who was initially referred to by the

letters M.D.C., agreed, after he had brought the case before the Court,

to the disclosure of his identity;

Whereas Italy has recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the

Court (Article 46 of the Convention (art. 46)) and ratified

Protocol No. 9 to the Convention (P9), Article 5 (P9-5) of which amends

Article 48 of the Convention (art. 48) so as to enable a person,

non-governmental organisation or group of individuals having lodged a

complaint with the European Commission of Human Rights

("the Commission") to refer the case to the Court;

Noting that the present case has not been referred to the Court

by either the Government of the respondent State or the Commission

under Article 48 para. 1 (a) or (d) of the Convention (art. 48-1-a,

art. 48-1-d);

Having regard to the Commission's report of 22 October 1996 on

the application (no. 29143/95) lodged with the Commission by

Mr Di Ciccio on 23 November 1994;

Whereas the applicant complained of the length of proceedings

in the Italian civil courts, to which he is a party, and alleged a

breach of Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention (art. 6-1), under which

"In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone

is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ...

tribunal ...";

Whereas the applicant, in specifying the object of his

application, as required by Rule 34 para. 1 (a) of Rules of Court B,

stated that he had brought the case before the Court with the sole aim

of avoiding being time-barred by failing to observe the

three-month limit laid down in Article 32 para. 1 of the Convention

(art. 32-1) and admitted that his case did not raise any problem

concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention;

Having regard to Article 48 of the Convention (art. 48) and

Rule 34 paras. 1 (a), 3 and 4 of Rules of Court B,

1. Finds that

(a) the case raises no serious question affecting the

interpretation or application of the Convention, as the

Court has already established case-law on the "reasonable

time" requirement in Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention

(art. 6-1); and

(b) the case does not, for any other reason, warrant

consideration by the Court as, in the event of a finding

that there has been a breach of the Convention, the

Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe can award

the applicant just satisfaction, having regard to any

proposals made by the Commission;

2. Decides, therefore, unanimously, that the case will not be

considered by the Court.

Done in English and in French, and notified in writing on

16 May 1997 pursuant to Rule 34 para. 4 of Rules of Court B.

Signed: Alphonse SPIELMANN

Chairman

Signed: Herbert PETZOLD

Registrar

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant