Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011.
Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya - Diputación Foral de Vizcaya (C-465/09 P and C-468/09 P), Territorio Histórico de Álava - Diputación Foral de Álava (C-466/09 P and C-469/09 P) and Territorio Histórico de Guipúzcoa - Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa (C-467/09 P and C-470/09 P) v European Commission.
C-465/09 P • 62009CJ0465 • ECLI:EU:C:2011:372
- 65 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 2 Outbound citations:
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 – Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya – Diputación Foral de Vizcaya and Others v Commission
(Joined Cases C-465/09 P to C-470/09 P)
Appeal – State aid – Action for annulment – Decision initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) EC – Subsequent final decisions finding State aid schemes implemented by Spain in 1993 for certain newly established firms in the provinces of Álava, Vizcaya and Guipúzcoa incompatible with the common market – Exemption from corporation tax – Lis pendens – Concept of ‘authorised aid’ – Legitimate expectations – Observance of a reasonable time-limit – Not notified
1. Appeals – Grounds – Challenge, repeating the pleas in law and arguments raised before the General Court, to the latter’s interpretation or application of Union law – Admissibility (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 78-79, 82)
2. Procedure – Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings – Conditions – New plea – Definition (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 48(2)) (see para. 84)
3. State aid – Existing aid and new aid – Classification as existing aid – Criteria – Unnotified aid measures – Authorisation by reason solely of the Commission’s silence – Not included (Art. 88(3) EC; Council Regulation No 659/1999, Art. 1(b)(ii)) (see paras 90-91, 94-97)
4. Appeals – Grounds – Review by the Court of the General Court’s refusal to order measures of inquiry – Scope (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 66(1)) (see paras 108-110)
5. State aid – Examination by the Commission – Compatibility of the aid with the common market – Assessment of the compatibility of unnotified aid with regard to guidelines adopted after the aid had been paid – No breach of the principle of legal certainty – No breach of the principle of non-retroactivity (Arts 87 EC and 88 EC; Commission Communication 98/C 74/06) (see paras 120-128)
6. State aid – Recovery of unlawful aid – Aid granted in breach of the procedural rules under Article 88 EC – Legitimate expectations possibly entertained by the recipients – Protection – Conditions and limits – No action taken by the Commission for a relatively long period – National authorities in breach of their duty to cooperate with the Commission – No legitimate expectations (Arts 87 EC and 88 EC) (see paras 150-156, 162-163)
7. Appeals – Grounds – Grounds of a judgment marred by infringement of Union law – Operative part well founded for other legal reasons – Rejection (see para. 171)
Re:
Operative part
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeals;
2.Orders the Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya – Diputación Foral de Vizcaya, the Territorio Histórico de Álava – Diputación Foral de Álava and the Territorio Histórico de Guipúzcoa – Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa to pay in equal shares the costs relating to the present appeals;
3.Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.
Related cases
Select a keyword to display the most cited other cases
- State aid
- Action for annulment
- Legitimate expectations.
- Appeals
- Compliance with a reasonable time-limit
- Lis pendens
- Decision initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) EC
- Subsequent final decisions finding that State aid schemes implemented by Spain in 1993 for certain newly established firms in Álava, Vizcaya and Guipúzcoa were not compatible with the common market
- Corporation tax exemptions
- Concept of 'authorised aid'
- No notification.
