Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF KUPIEC v. POLAND
Commission Regulation (EC) No 307/2004 of 20 February 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, and the criteria for fixing the amounts of such refunds, and providing special measures in respect of certain refund certificates
CASE OF ZEYNALOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2696/1999 of 17 December 1999 fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled round grain rice in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2180/1999
SAMMUT AND VISA INVESTMENTS LIMITED v. MALTA
NOBILI MASSUERO v. ITALY
Commission Regulation (EC) No 17/2002 of 7 January 2002 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
CASE OF KARLHEINZ SCHMIDT v. GERMANYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENILLA
X. and Y. v. ICELAND
M. v. FRANCE

Search
document

Document text Analytics

M. v. FRANCE

Doc ref: 9984/82 • ECHR ID: 001-74598

Document date: October 17, 1985

Inbound citations: 4
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

M. v. FRANCE

Doc ref: 9984/82 • ECHR ID: 001-74598

Document date: October 17, 1985

Cited paragraphs only

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846