LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
NICA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Doc ref: 29082/16;31354/16;31503/16;39576/16;41315/16;41714/16;42288/16;61084/16;77939/16 • ECHR ID: 001-213590
Document date: October 21, 2021
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 2
NICA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Doc ref: 29082/16;31354/16;31503/16;39576/16;41315/16;41714/16;42288/16;61084/16;77939/16 • ECHR ID: 001-213590
Document date: October 21, 2021
Cited paragraphs only
FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 29082/16 Paul NICA against Romania and 8 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 21 October 2021 as a Committee composed of:
Armen Harutyunyan, President, Jolien Schukking, Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”).
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
After unsuccessful friendly-settlement negotiations, the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention.
The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
The applicants were sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declarations several weeks before the date of this decision. The Court has not received a response from the applicants accepting the terms of the declarations.
The Court observes that Article 37 § 1 (c) enables it to strike a case out of its list if:
“... for any other reason established by the Court, it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application”.
Thus, it may strike out applications under Article 37 § 1 (c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicants wish the examination of the cases to be continued (see, in particular, the Tahsin Acar v. Turkey judgment (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75 ‑ 77, ECHR 2003-VI).
The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the inadequate conditions of detention (see, for example, RezmiveÈ™ and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017).
Noting the admissions contained in the Government’s declarations as well as the amount of compensation proposed – which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases – the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications (Article 37 § 1 (c)).
In the light of the above considerations, the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the applications (Article 37 § 1 in fine ).
Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declarations, the applications may be restored to the list in accordance with Article 37 § 2 of the Convention (see Josipović v. Serbia (dec.), no. 18369/07, 4 March 2008).
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Takes note of the terms of the respondent Government’s declarations and of the arrangements for ensuring compliance with the undertakings referred to therein;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 18 November 2021.
{signature_p_2}
Viktoriya Maradudina Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention)
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant
(in euros) [1]
29082/16
16/01/2017
Paul NICA
1966
14/10/2020
2,700
31354/16
16/06/2016
Lucian MIHAI
1984
02/04/2021
2,700
31503/16
28/06/2016
Florin RÄ‚DULESCU
1991
14/10/2020
900
39576/16
01/08/2016
Valentin NICA
1972
20/05/2021
2,700
41315/16
31/01/2017
Ciprian IUȘAN
1984Titiana-Daniela Satnoianu
Brașov
20/05/2021
2,700
41714/16
30/01/2017
Attila MEZEI
1963Lacrima-Cristina Stan
Cluj Napoca
29/06/2021
4,500
42288/16
20/09/2016
Marius TUDOR
1983
20/05/2021
900
61084/16
22/11/2016
Caius-Cezar ALDESCU
1968
05/04/2021
900
77939/16
10/01/2017
Gabriel Florin GEORGESCU
1989
20/05/2021
2,700
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
