Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF SENCHENKO AND OTHER "YAKUT PENSIONERS" CASES v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 32865/06, 3137/07, 3158/07, 5650/07, 5654/07, 5657/07, 5663/07, 6727/07, 6822/07, 6828/07, 6846/07, ... • ECHR ID: 001-92787

Document date: May 28, 2009

  • Inbound citations: 2
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 3

CASE OF SENCHENKO AND OTHER "YAKUT PENSIONERS" CASES v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 32865/06, 3137/07, 3158/07, 5650/07, 5654/07, 5657/07, 5663/07, 6727/07, 6822/07, 6828/07, 6846/07, ... • ECHR ID: 001-92787

Document date: May 28, 2009

Cited paragraphs only

FIRST SECTION

CASE OF SENCHENKO AND OTHERS and 35 other “Yakut pensioners” cases v. RUSSIA

(Application s no s . 32865/06, 3137/07 , 3158/07 , 5650/07 , 5654/07 , 5657/07 , 5663/07 , 6727/07 , 6822/07 , 6828/07 , 6846/07 , 8553/07 , 8560/07 , 11576/07 , 11578/07 , 11582/07 , 11583/07 , 11584/07 , 11585/07 , 12966/07 , 13830/07 , 13831/07 , 13833/07 , 13835/07 , 19001/07 , 19003/07 , 19736/07 , 19738/07 , 19740/07 , 19741/07 , 19744/07 , 19746/07 , 19749/07 , 19752/07 , 20343/07 , and 20939/07 )

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

28 May 2009

FINAL

06 / 11 /2009

This judgment may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Senchenko and Others and 35 other “Yakut pensioners” cases v. Russia ,

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:

Christos Rozakis , President, Nina Vajić , Anatoly Kovler , Khanlar Hajiyev , Dean Spielmann , Sverre Erik Jebens , George Nicolaou , judges, and Søren Nielsen , Section Registrar ,

Having deliberated in private on 7 May 2009 ,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1 . The case originated in 36 applications against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by 90 Russian nationals whose names and dates of birth are tabulated in the Annex (“the applicants”). The applications ’ dates of introduction are also tabulated in the Annex.

On 4 September 2007 one of the applicants, Ms Skripka Nadezhda Yegorovna, died, and her daughter , Ms Skripka Oksana Vasiliyevna , adopted her application. On an unspecified date another applicant, Mr Maznitsa Dmitriy Anatolyevich, died, but no heir showed interest in pursuing his application.

2 . The applicants were represented by Mr I. Novikov, a lawyer practising in Novosibirsk . The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by M r s V. Milinchuk , former Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights .

3 . T he President of the First Section decided to communicate the applications to the Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the applications at the same time as their admissibility (Article 29 § 3) and to join the applications (Rule 42 of the Rules of Court).

THE FACTS

4 . The applicants are pensioners. They sued a pension authority for miscalculating their pensions. The Neryungri Town Court of Yakutia held for the applicants. The Supreme Court of Yakutia upheld those judgments on appeal and they became binding. Later, on the pension authority ’ s request, the Presidium of the Supreme Court of Yakutia quashed the judgments on supervisory review because it considered that the courts below had misinterpreted material law. The dates of the court decisions are tabulated in the Annex.

THE LAW

I. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1

5 . The applicants complained under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention, and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the quashing of their judgments. The Court considers it appropriate to examine this complaint under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 only. Insofar as relevant, these Articles read as follows:

Article 6 § 1

“In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal...”

Article 1 of Protocol No. 1

“Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law.

The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties.”

A. Admissibility

6 . The Government argued that the applications were inadmissible.

The proceedings in question had been outside the sphere of Article 6 because they had concerned pension laws of a general application.

Supervisory review had been a legitimate feature of Russia ’ s legal system. The judgments had had to be quashed because they had been based on a misapplication of law and hence had contained a fundamental defect. The supervisory review had aimed to ensure a uniform application of pension laws and hence promoted legal certainty. The domestic procedure for supervisory review had been respected. The supervisory review had been set in motion by a party to the proceedings and had happened shortly after the judgments had become binding.

Annulment of binding judgments had been legitimate in a democratic society and known, for example, to such countries as Germany , Austria , and Switzerland . Besides, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe had found that Russia ’ s supervisory-review procedure had improved.

In the cases at hand, the supervisory review had not breached Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 because the authorities left to the applicants the sums paid before the quashing. Besides, since the Presidium had in the end found that the applicants ’ claims had been unfounded, they had not had a “possession” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

7 . The applicants insisted that their applications were admissible.

The judgments had been correct. The Presidium ’ s disagreement with the lower courts ’ reading of the law had not justified the quashing. Even though the State had left to the applicants the sums paid before the quashing, these sums had still been lower that they should have been under the judgments.

8 . The Court notes, first, that Mr Maznitsa has died and that no heir has shown interest in pursuing his part of application no. 6727/07. Furtherm ore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of that application . In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike Mr Maznitsa ’ s part of application no. 6727/07 out of the list.

9 . As to the other applicants, the Court finds that their disputes concerned their individual pensions and hence fell within the ambit of Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Magomedov v. Russia , no. 20111/03, § 16, 4 December 2008 ).

10 . The Court notes that the applications are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible.

B. Merits

11 . The Court has earlier found violations of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 where, like in the present cases, supervisory review was used to quash a binding judgment on the ground of an alleged misinterpretation of material law (see, for example, Kot v. Russia , no. 20887/03, § 29, 18 January 2007). There is no reason to depart from that finding in the present case.

12 . There has, accordingly, been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

II . APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

13 . Article 41 of the Convention provides:

“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”

14 . The applicants set out claims for just satisfaction in their initial application forms, but failed to resubmit these claims at the appropriate stage of the proceedings, i.e. after notice of the applications had been given to the Government.

15 . Nevertheless, the Court considers it reasonable in the circumstances of the present applications to grant the applicants just satisfaction ad hoc ( see Levochkina v. Russia , no. 944/02, § § 53–55 , 5 July 2007 ). Making its assessment on an equitable and reasonable bas i s, the Court awards each applicant 2,000 euros in respect of pecuniary damage, non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY

1. Decides to join the applications;

2 . Decides to strike out of its list of cases Mr Maznitsa ’ s part of application no. 6727/07 ;

3 . Declares the other applications admissible;

4 . Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;

5 . Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay each applicant, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, EUR 2,000 ( two thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of pecuniary damage , non-pecuniary damage , and costs and expenses, to be converted into Russian roubles at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;

Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 May 2009 , pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Søren Nielsen Christos Rozakis Registrar Pr esident

ANNEX

Appl. no.

Introduced on

Name of Applicant

Born

Judgment of

Binding on

Quashed on

32865/06

17/06/06

Senchenko Naylya Rukhkhulovna

1940

01/04/04

12/05/04

09/02/06

Dmitriyeva Alevtina Ivanovna

1952

01/04/04

12/05/04

09/02/06

Dmitriyeva Margarita Petrovna

1939

01/04/04

12/05/04

09/02/06

Levitskiy Nikolay Savelyevich

1934

01/04/04

12/05/04

09/02/06

Levitskaya Natalya Aleksandrovna

1936

01/04/04

12/05/04

09/02/06

Lebedeva Vera Yevdokimovna

1949

01/04/04

12/05/04

09/02/06

Makusheva Svetlana Aleksandrovna

1935

01/04/04

12/05/04

09/02/06

Moskaleva Galina Yegorovna

1950

01/04/04

12/05/04

09/02/06

Moskalev Nikolay Vasilyevich

1946

01/04/04

12/05/04

09/02/06

Plakhotnichenko Pavel Igorevich

1946

01/04/04

12/05/04

09/02/06

Spiridonova Taisiya Vasilyevna

1949

01/04/04

12/05/04

09/02/06

3137/07

29/11/06

Zhmurin Yuriy Viktorovich

1948

03/05/04

28/03/05

27/07/06

Karbovskaya Galina Ivanovna

1950

03/05/04

28/03/05

27/07/06

3158/07

01/12/06

Chumakova Anna Dmitriyevna

1944

05/10/04

21/03/05

24/08/06

5650/07

15/11/06

Sagaydakova Lyudmila Vasilyevna

1940

05/10/04

21/03/05

24/08/06

Demakova Natalya Vladislavovna

1951

05/10/04

21/03/05

24/08/06

Kozlova Lyudmila Alekseyevna

1940

05/10/04

21/03/05

24/08/06

Korshikova Vera Pavlovna

1934

05/10/04

21/03/05

24/08/06

Khvorova Lyubov Alekseyevna

1949

05/10/04

21/03/05

24/08/06

Muzyreva Nina Vasilyevna

1949

05/10/04

21/03/05

24/08/06

Myzyrev Yuriy Pavlovich

1943

05/10/04

21/03/05

24/08/06

Ilchuk Valeriy Georgiyevich

1950

05/10/04

21/03/05

24/08/06

Kazarenko Vladimir Savelyevich

1930

05/10/04

21/03/05

24/08/06

Labzin Nikolay Ivanovich

1945

05/10/04

21/03/05

24/08/06

5654/07

17/11/06

Ostrova Lyudmila Petrovna

1952

30/11/04

21/03/05

27/07/06

5657/07

29/12/06

Matveyeva Lidiya Ivanovna

1948

21/04/05

06/06/05

12/10/06

Loseva Tamara Moiseyevna

1954

21/04/05

06/06/05

12/10/06

Solovyova Galina Stepanovna

1946

21/04/05

06/06/05

12/10/06

5663/07

17/11/06

Loginova Tamara Ivanovna

1941

28/09/04

21/03/05

24/08/06

6727/07

01/10/06

Vasilyeva Nina Leonidovna

1945

17/03/05

18/04/05

27/07/06

Doruda Yevgeniy Nikiforovich

1945

17/03/05

18/04/05

27/07/06

Lefterova Lyudmila Aleksandrovna

1954

17/03/05

18/04/05

27/07/06

Maznitsa Dmitriy Anatolyevich

1971

17/03/05

18/04/05

27/07/06

Podozyorov Vladimir Mikhaylovich

1949

17/03/05

18/04/05

27/07/06

Fyodorova Mariya Lukinichna

1954

17/03/05

18/04/05

27/07/06

6822/07

29/12/06

Vinnik Grigoriy Yakovlevich

1949

23/03/05

04/05/05

24/08/06

6828/07

29/12/06

Sharshavina Lyubov Demyanovna

1954

17/03/05

18/04/05

24/08/06

6846/07

22/12/06

Pyankov Viktor Arkadyevich

1950

28/06/05

01/08/05

16/11/06

Pyankova Mariya Mikhaylovna

1950

28/06/05

01/08/05

16/11/06

8553/07

12/01/07

Krupa Tamara Ivanovna

1947

04/03/05

18/04/05

24/08/06

8560/07

16/01/07

Lebid Roman Petrovich

1963

18/11/04

21/03/05

27/07/06

11576/07

11/12/06

Burlakova Tatyana Andreyevna

1957

22/11/04

21/03/05

13/07/06

Vintovkina Nadezhda Alekseyevna

1954

22/11/04

21/03/05

13/07/06

11578/07

08/11/06

Torlova Tatyana Nikitichna

1953

05/10/04

23/03/05

27/07/06

11582/07

09/11/06

Avdeyeva Valentina Stepanovna

1948

27/09/04

21/03/05

27/07/06

Ovechkin Grigoriy Pavlovich

1949

27/09/04

21/03/05

27/07/06

11583/07

11/12/06

Bystrov Aleksandr Mikhaylovich

1953

16/08/04

21/03/05

27/07/06

11584/07

11/12/06

Belyayev Viktor Fyodorovich

1939

17/03/05

18/04/05

27/07/06

11585/07

07/11/06

Shipitsyna Lyudmila Georgiyevna

1949

30/11/04

23/03/05

24/08/06

12966/07

02/01/07

Ananyeva Tamara Nikolayevna

1950

31/03/05

08/06/05

27/07/06

13830/07

15/02/07

Samikova Lyudmila Alekseyevna

1954

30/03/05

06/06/05

16/11/06

Yesipenko Nikolay Stepanovich

1947

30/03/05

06/06/05

16/11/06

13831/07

11/02/07

Gredasova Lyubov Vasilyevna

1951

07/04/05

06/06/05

16/11/06

13833/07

15/02/07

Kim Lev Borisovich

1949

09/03/05

11/04/05

24/08/06

13835/07

15/02/07

Kostovarov Aleksandr Mikhaylovich

1952

23/03/05

23/05/05

16/11/06

19001/07

21/03/07

Varnakova Larisa Aleksandrovna

1952

21/04/05

29/06/05

19/10/06

Morozova Nadezhda Alekseyevna

1948

21/04/05

29/06/05

19/10/06

Skripka Nadezhda Yegorovna

1947

21/04/05

29/06/05

19/10/06

Fritz Galina Fyodorovna

1935

21/04/05

29/06/05

19/10/06

19003/07

16/02/07

Derevyannykh Valentina Mikhaylovna

1956

28/06/05

01/08/05

30/11/06

Davletov Talgat Shakirovich

1950

28/06/05

01/08/05

30/11/06

Oleynikova Vera Georgiyevna

1955

28/06/05

01/08/05

30/11/06

Ryazanova Svetlana Ivanovna

1962

28/06/05

01/08/05

30/11/06

Pavlik Pyotr Nikitovich

1949

28/06/05

01/08/05

30/11/06

19736/07

07/03/07

Fedko Vladimir Mikhaylovich

1950

10/06/05

06/07/05

12/10/06

19738/07

01/03/07

Shumikhina Lyudmila Mikhaylovna

1946

07/04/05

06/06/05

12/10/06

19740/07

01/03/07

Gaponova Olga Aleksandrovna

1954

07/04/05

06/06/05

12/10/06

Drozhzhina Galina Alekseyevna

1948

07/04/05

06/06/05

12/10/06

19741/07

01/03/07

Aleksandrov Nikolay Mikhaylovich

1954

27/06/05

27/07/05

12/10/06

19744/07

23/02/07

Veretelnik Anatoliy Mikhaylovich

1947

21/03/05

23/05/05

12/10/06`

19746/07

27/02/07

Godunova Natalya Ivanovna

1954

08/04/05

08/06/05

16/11/06

Zolotukhina Tatyana Prokopyevna

1954

08/04/05

08/06/05

16/11/06

Samoylova Lyubov Davydovna

1954

08/04/05

08/06/05

16/11/06

19749/07

23/02/07

Koreneva Lyudmila Georgiyevna

1955

29/04/05

20/06/05

09/11/06

Skripelyova Valentina Mikhaylovna

1954

29/04/05

20/06/05

09/11/06

Stolova Tamara Vladimirovna

1954

29/04/05

20/06/05

09/11/06

19752/07

07/03/07

Stepanova Tatyana Ivanovna

1951

04/04/05

08/06/05

16/11/06

Sinitsyna Anna Ivanovna

1951

04/04/05

08/06/05

16/11/06

20343/07

16/02/07

Andrianova Yelena Fyodorovna

1954

11/05/05

15/06/05

16/11/06

Dorokhov Gennadiy Petrovich

1950

11/05/05

15/06/05

16/11/06

Davletova Firuza Shaykhenurovna

1955

11/05/05

15/06/05

16/11/06

Kotova Olga Igorevna

1957

11/05/05

15/06/05

16/11/06

Parshin Sergey Aleksandrovich

1956

11/05/05

15/06/05

16/11/06

Shcherbakov Aleksandr Aleksandrovich

1949

11/05/05

15/06/05

16/11/06

Shcherbakova Tatyana Innokentyevna

1954

11/05/05

15/06/05

16/11/06

Kravchenko Yekaterina Filippovna

1931

11/05/05

15/06/05

16/11/06

Pigolkina Tatyana Pavlovna

1954

11/05/05

15/06/05

16/11/06

20939/07

10/04/07

Plakhotnik Mariya Yevstafyevna

1938

26/09/05

31/10/05

16/11/06

Kolesnikova Yelena Dmitriyevna

1943

26/09/05

31/10/05

16/11/06

Sergeyeva Lyudmila Mikhaylovna

1945

26/09/05

31/10/05

16/11/06

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255